MODALITY OF PHILOSOPHICAL TEXT
https://doi.org/10.18384/2224-0209-2022-1-1113
Abstract
Aim. To identify the significance of the category of modality for the semantic unity of philosophical text in the development of a system of its adequate interpretation.
Methodology. Based on structural-functional, descriptive, and conceptual methods and the method of segment analysis, this paper analyzes several abstracts from classical academic philosophical text from the point of view of one of the main text-forming categories which is the category of modality.
Results. The article proves that the selected invariant signs of modality should serve as a basis for modeling the type of philosophical text.
Research implications. The results of the research might prove useful for development of the language theory as well as for modeling of various types of texts. They are of interest for linguists, philologists, journalists, and philosophers engaged in the problems of philosophical text generation.
About the Author
M. LevchenkoRussian Federation
Marina N. Levchenko – Dr. Sci. (Philology), Prof., Head at the Department of German Philology
141014, Moscow region, Mytishchi, ul. Very Voloshinoy 24
References
1. Agaeva F. A. Modal'nost' kak lingvisticheskaya kategoriya (na materiale angliiskogo i turkmenskogo yazyka) : avtoref. dis. … kand. filol. nauk [Modality as a linguistic category (on the material of the English and Turkmen languages) : abstract of Cand. Sci. thesis in Philological sciences]. Baku, 1990. 47 p.
2. Valiev D. F., Yegorova Yu. A. [Philosophy and the Science: Similarities and the Differences]. In: Materialy II Mezhdunarodnoi studencheskoi nauchnoi konferentsii «Studencheskii nauchnyi forum» [Materials of the II International Student Scientific Conference “Student Scientific Forum”]. Available at: http://files.scienceforum.ru/pdf/2010/article727.pdf (accessed: 16.12.2019).
3. Vinogradov V. V. Grammatika russkogo yazyka. T. 2 [Grammar of the Russian language. Vol. 2]. Moscow, Akademia nauk SSSR Publ., 1954. 703 p.
4. Galperin I. R. Tekst kak ob"ekt lingvisticheskogo issledovaniya [Text as an object of linguistic research]. Moscow, URSS Publ., 2004. 144 p.
5. Gulyga E. V., Shendels E. I. Grammatiko-leksicheskie polya v sovremennom nemetskom yazyke [Grammatical-lexical fields in modern German]. Moscow, Prosveshchenie Publ., 1969. 184 p.
6. Donskova E. Yu. [Subjective modality in fiction text: phenomenological status and pragmatic potential]. In: Izvestiya Yuzhnogo federal'nogo universiteta. Filologicheskie nauki [Proceedings of southern Federal University. Philology], 2016, no. 1, pp. 94–102.
7. Krivonosov A. T. [On the semantic nature of modal particles]. In: Nauchnye doklady vysshei shkoly. Filologicheskie nauki [Scientific Essays of Higher Education. Philological Sciences], 1982, no. 5, pp. 50–58.
8. Kuksa I. Yu. [Modal particles, their function and meaning in the texts of the “St. Peterburg Vedomosti” newspaper (late 18th – mid19th centuries)]. In: Vestnik Baltiiskogo federal'nogo universiteta im. I. Kanta [Immanuel Kant Baltic Federal University Vestnik], 2018, no. 1, pp. 35–43.
9. Levchenko M. N. Interpretatsiya teksta i ego grammaticheskikh modelei. Tipologicheskii aspekt [Interpretation of text and its grammatical patterns. Typological aspect]. Moscow, MRSU Ed. off. Publ., 2013. 240 p.
10. Moskal'skaya O. I. [Text as a linguistic notion]. In: Inostrannye yazyki v shkole [Foreign languages at school], 1978, no. 3, pp. 6–9.
11. Serebryakova A. Yu. Osobennosti predstavleniya kategorii personal'nosti v filosofskikh tekstakh I. Kanta i ikh perevodakh na russkii yazyk : avtoref. dis. … kand. filol. nauk [Peculiarities of the presentation of the category of personality in the philosophical texts of I. Kant and their translations into Russian : abstract of Cand. Sci. thesis in Philological sciences]. Chelyabinsk, 2005. 24 p.
12. Solganik G. Ya. Ocherki modal'nogo sintaksisa [Essays on modal syntax]. Moscow, Flinta Publ., 2010. 132 p.
13. Shvedova N. Yu. [Syntax time]. In: Nauchnye doklady vysshei shkoly. Filologicheskie nauki [Scientific Essays of Higher Education. Philological Sciences], 1978, no. 6, pp. 88–97.