THE SYMBOLIC POTENTIAL OF THE PAST IN THE PROCESS OF CONSTRUCTING SPACE: “IT’S NOT EVEN PAST” (ON THE ISSUE OF ACTIVATING SYSTEM-FORMING RESERVES)
https://doi.org/10.18384/2224-0209-2022-1-1114
Abstract
Aim. The purpose of this article is to identify the political potential of the units of the past in the process of formation and space structuring.
Methodology. The main content of the study is represented by the analysis of approaches to assessment of the categories of the past relative to the present and the future in the context of organization and implementation of symbolic power.
Results. Within the framework of this study, peculiarities of use of units of the past in the formation of complex material and non-material space for strategic and tactical purposes were revealed.
Research implications. The results of the research represent the author’s contribution to the development of the theory of political space and self-organization of communities. They can be used in conducting political campaigns.
About the Author
I. Khabarov
Office of the Public Chamber of the Tambov region
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Ilya A. Khabarov – Cand. Sci. (Political Sciences), Head
392000, Tambov, ul. Sovetskaya, 118
References
1. Bevernage B. [“The Pastness of the Past”: Some Reflections on the Politics of Historicization and the Crisis of Historicist Pastness]. In: Logos [Logos], 2021, vol. 31, no. 4, pp. 65–94.
2. Bourdieu P. [Social space and symbolic power]. In: THESIS, 1993, iss. 2, pp. 137–150.
3. Burlina E. Ya., Naumova O. S., Grankina E. A. [“Citizen” as a transdisciplinary concept]. In: Aspirantskii Vestnik Povolzh’ya [Postgraduate Bulletin of the Volga Region], 2016, vol. 16, no. 7-8, pp. 17–19.
4. Vasileva Zh. V. [Vintage as a Reactualization of Cultural Heritage in the Fashion Industry]. In: “Nauchnyi vestnik gumanitarno-sotsial’nogo instituta” [ “Scientific Bulletin of the Humanitarian and Social Institute”], 2019, no. 8. Available at: http://science-gsi.ru (accessed: 02.10.2021).
5. Goryacheva E. A., Lazebnaya K. P. [Consumption as a phenomenon of transmitting long-dated symbols. Points of Contact Between Pitirim Sorokin’s Theory of the Symbolic and Rйgis Debray’s Mediology]. In: Zhurnal sotsiologii i sotsial’noi antropologii [The Journal of Sociology and Social Anthropology], 2011, vol. 14, no. 5, pp. 108–120.
6. Demin I. V., Bogdanova N. M. [The past and the eternal: correlation of categories “Past” and “Bygone in the context of M. Heidegger’s existential analytics]. In: Izvestiya vysshikh uchebnykh zavedenii. Povolzhskii region. Gumanitarnye nauki [University proceedings. Volga region. Humanities], 2014, no. 3, pp. 67–77.
7. Lorenz Сh. [Out of time? Some Critical Reflections on Franзois Hartog’s Presentism]. In: Logos [Logos], 2021, vol. 31, no. 4, pp. 31–64.
8. Malinova O. Yu. [Politics of Memory as a Branch of Symbolic Politics]. In: Metod [Method], 2019, no. 9, pp. 285–312.
9. Nikolai F. [“New Wars”: Disappearance of the Future and/or Synchronization of Temporalities] In: Logos [Logos], 2021, vol. 31, no. 4, pp.119-136.
10. Nikolaichuk I. A., Yanglyaeva M. M., Yakova T. S. [Managing the past and protecting the interests of the state]. In: Problemy natsional’noi strategii [Problems of national strategy], 2020, no. 2, pp. 186–203.
11. Politov A. V. [The phenomenon of the Trace in the philosophy of Jacques Derrida and its ontological interpretation]. In: Vestnik Permskogo natsional’nogo issledovatel’skogo politekhnicheskogo universiteta. Kul’tura. Istoriya. Filosofiya. Pravo [Bulletin of the Perm national research polytechnic university. Culture. History], 2016, no. 4, pp. 93–102.
12. Repina L. P. [Memory and knowledge of the past in the structure of identity]. In: Dialog so vremenem [Dialogue with time], 2007, no. 21, pp. 5–21.
13. Sokolov B. G. [Symbolization of the past: total vintage]. In: STUDIA CULTURAE, 2015, no. 24, pp. 67–85.
14. Solntsev N. V. [The Problem of Understanding the Past: Hermeneutical Experience]. In: Uchenye zapiski rossiiskogo gosudarstvennogo sotsial’nogo universiteta [Scientific Notes of the Russian State Social University], 2009, no. 1, pp. 77–85.
15. Chekantseva Z. A. [Path Dependence, Politics of Time and Metamorphosis of History]. In: Vestnik Permskogo universiteta [Bulletin of Perm University], 2020, no. 3 (50), pp. 5–16.
16. Shvetsov K. P. [Imaginary past: On memory and categorization of the past]. In: Mezhdunarodnyi zhurnal issledovanii kul’tury [The International Journal of Cultural Studies], 2013, no. 2 (11), pp. 81–85.
17. Shcherbakov D. A. [The past which doesn’t exist and the past which exists]. In: Vestnik Orenburgskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta [Bulletin of Orenburg State University], 2014, no. 4 (165), pp. 274–280.
18. Edelman M. Politics as symbolic action. Mass arousal and quiescence. Chicago, Markham publishing company, 1971. 188 p.
19. M. Bernhard, J. Kubik, eds. Twenty Years After Communism: The Politics of Memory and Commemoration. Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2014. 362 p.
Review
Views:
380
Email this article 