FUTURE EMPIRES: VARIANTS, CONFIGURATIONS, AND LINES OF SPLIT IN THE LEADING WORKS OF PHILOSOPHICAL SCIENCE FICTION OF THE LATE 20TH–BEGINNING OF THE 21ST CENTURIES
https://doi.org/10.18384/2224-0209-2024-4-1513
Abstract
Aim. Having analyzed several models of the past and the future, to compare them and draw conclusions about how the vision of empire has changed over time and which grounds for creating empires are more effective, as well as to analyze how the empires of the future should be different from the empires of the past. The purpose of this work is also to introduce into scientific circulation new sources containing an understanding of the problems and contradictions of empire as a phenomenon. In the article, the author focuses on the images of empires of the future shaped in the works of science fiction of the late XX – early XXI centuries.
Methodology. Based on three works selected for analysis, in which the future and the past of the imperial type are modeled, the author of the article conducts a comparative analysis of these models.
Results. The author comes to conclusions about the extent to which certain features of classical empires will be in demand in the future as well as their upcoming adaptation to new historical and civilizational conditions. Thus, the model of unification based on personal power, personal authority and strength turns out to be fragile in relation to diverse peoples who violate their cultural and confessional sovereignty, whereas the unification of equally diverse peoples facing similar challenges and united by common action leads to harmony and carries a tendency to strengthen the unity even with belonging to different cultures and beliefs.
Research implications. The research deepens the understanding of the patterns of development of large multi-ethnic and multi-confessional formations also referred to by the term “empire”. The results of the study can be used in the analysis of the development of modern state entities and in training courses on political science, philosophy and history.
About the Author
Yulia S. ChernyakhovskayaRussian Federation
Dr. Sci. (Political Sciences), Assoc. Prof., Leading Researcher, Head of the Center for the Study of Political Culture
References
1. Алейник Е. В. Проблемы определения термина "империя" в современной политологии // Наука и образование – важнейший фактор развития общества в современных условиях: материалы XI Международной научно-практической конференции. Караганда: Кент – LTD, 2024. С. 231–235.
2. Гайда Ф. А. Официальное понимание «империи» в Росси начала XVIII – начала XX века // Тетради по консерватизму. 2022. №1. С. 56–64.
3. Грачев Н. И. Империя как форма государства: понятие и признаки // Вестник Волгоградского государственного университета. Серия 5: Юриспруденция. 2012. №2. С. 18–28.
4. Луньков М. И. Технологическое развитие империи будущего в романе Аркади Мартин "Память, что зовётся империей" // Актуальные проблемы современной филологии: материалы научно-практической конференции с международным участием. Красноярск: Красноярский государственный педагогический университет им. В. П. Астафьева, 2024. С. 18–21.
5. Пуздрач Ю. В. Империя. Основные принципы // Право и государство: теория и практика. 2024. №7. С. 69–72.
6. Санькова С. М., Шевченко М. А. Имперский дискурс в творчестве М. О. Меньшикова // Тетради по консерватизму. 2022. №1. С. 297–307.
7. Сквозников А. Н. Нетипичные формы государственного устройства: на примере империи // Вектор науки Тольяттинского государственного университета. Серия: Юридические науки. 2024. №1. С. 20–27.
8. Тальская О. Д. Феномен империй в современных политических теориях // Социально-гуманитарные знания. 2017. №2. С. 341–347.