Preview

Russian Social and Humanitarian Journal

Advanced search

CATEGORY AND LEVELS OF POLITICAL PROCESS: ANALYSIS OF APPROACHES TO DEFINITION

https://doi.org/10.18384/2224-0209-2024-3-1469

Abstract

Aim. To form a conceptual model of the political process, to define the category of "political process", the levels of the political process and the states of the political system.

Methodology. The approaches to the definition of the political process are analyzed: behaviorist, institutional and structural-functional approaches.

Results. The analysis made it possible to identify three levels of the political process: micro-level, meso-level and macro-level; the main elements of the political process and the states of the political system are identified.

Research implications. A conceptual model of the political process consisting of three levels is proposed; definitions of the categories "political process" and "sustainability of the political system" are formulated.

About the Author

Dmitriy V. Afonin
Lomonosov Moscow State University
Russian Federation

Postgraduate student, Department of History and Theory of Politics



References

1. Amin S. The liberal virus: permanent war and the Americanization of the world (Rus. ed.: Nagib Sh., Kastalskii S., transls. Virus liberalizma. Permanentnaya voina i amerikanizatsiya mira. Moscow, Evropa Publ., 2007. 168 p.).

2. Anokhin M. G. Politicheskie sistemy: adaptatsiya, dinamika, ustoichivost' (teoretiko-prikladnoi analiz) [Political systems: adaptation, dynamics, stability (theoretical and applied analysis)]. Moscow, Infomart Publ., 1996. 305 p.

3. Berger P. [Introduction: Cultural Dynamics of Globalization]. In: Berger P. Mnogolikaya globalizatsiya [The Many Faces of Globalization]. Moscow, Aspekt Press Publ., 2004, pp. 8–24.

4. Gadzhiev Kh. A., Semchenkov A. S. [Political System Sustainability Index: Experience of Measurements in Three Countries]. In: PolitBook, 2020, no. 1, pp. 161–194.

5. Danilevsky N. Ya. Rossiya i Evropa [Russia and Europe]. Moscow, Yurait Publ., 2024. 453 p.

6. Karpova N. V. [Sociocultural analysis of socio-political systems: methodological foundations of the study]. In: Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Seriya 18: Sotsiologiya i politologiya [Moscow State University Bulletin. Series 18: Sociology and Political Science], 2021, no. 4, pp. 216–234.

7. Kolsarieva N. Sh. [D. Easton's contribution to the study of the political system as a political-legal category]. In: Byulleten' nauki i praktiki [Bulletin of Science and Practice], 2023, no. 3, pp. 304–311.

8. Mikhaylenok O. M., Shchenina O. G. [The anthropological dimension of politics: new "Network man"]. In: Vestnik Moskovskogo gosudarstvennogo oblastnogo universiteta (elektronnyi zhurnal) [Bulletin of Moscow Region State University (e-journal)], 2018, no. 2. Available at: www.evestnik-mgou.ru (accessed: 20.05.2024).

9. Semenov E. E. [Virtual network paradigm of political activity]. In: Vlast [The Authority], 2013, no. 4, pp. 34–38.

10. Setov N. R. [The Problem of Stability of Political Systems in Western Political Science of the 20th Century: The Behavioural Approach]. In: Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Seriya 12: Politicheskie nauki [Moscow University Bulletin. Series 12: Political sciences], 2015, no. 5, pp. 54–66.

11. Farmer M. [Rational Choice: Theory and Practice]. In: Polis. Politicheskie issledovaniya [Polis. Political studies], 1994, no. 3, pp. 47–58.

12. Huntington S. [Political order in changing societies]. Moscow, Progress-Traditsiya Publ., 2004. 480 p.

13. Chelenkova I. Y. [The management concept in sociological discourse]. In: Sotsial'no-gumanitarnye znaniya [Social and humanitarian knowledge], 2021, no. 5, pp. 250–259.

14. Eizenshtadt Sh. [Modernization failures]. In: Neprikosnovennyi zapas [Emergency reserve], 2010, no. 6, pp. 16–18.


Supplementary files

Review

Views: 127


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2224-0209 (Online)