ON THE QUESTION OF TYPOLOGY OF SUBJECTS OF HYBRID WARS
https://doi.org/10.18384/2224-0209-2024-1-1416
Abstract
Aim. To develop a classification of subjects taking part in modern hybrid wars.
Methodology. The main content of the study is the analysis of foreign and domestic literature on modern conflicts, hybrid wars. The author used general scientific methods (analysis, synthesis, induction, deduction, comparison), observation methods, traditional document analysis and case studies.
Results. The conclusion is made that the subjects of hybrid wars are particularly dangerous in the form of alliances of state and non-state actors.
Research implications. The results of this research can be used in scientific and teaching activities during the study of the hybrid war concept, as well as in the work of state bodies responsible for ensuring national security.
About the Author
Apty A. AlaudinovRussian Federation
Cand. Sci. (Political Science), Independent researcher
References
1. Batyuck V. I. [US policy in the post-Soviet space after the end of the Cold War]. In: Mezhdunarodnaya zhizn' [The International Affairs], 2011, no. 8, pp. 61–75.
2. Belyaev G. Yu. [Neo-Nazism as a model of socialization and education: a threat to state security and a global challenge to humanistic educational systems]. In: Prostranstvo i vremya [Space and time], 2015, no. 1-2, pp. 43–52.
3. Zaitsev A. Ya., Manoilo A. V. [The role of private military companies in the use of cloud adversary technologies]. In: Vestnik Rossiiskoi akademii nauk [Bulletin of the Russian Academy of Sciences], 2021, vol. 91, no. 2, pp. 167–173.
4. Manoilo A. V. [Information warfare and new political reality (I)]. In: Vestnik Moskovskogo gosudarstvennogo oblastnogo universiteta (elektronnyi zhurnal) [Bulletin of the Moscow Region State University (e-journal)]. 2021, no. 1. Available at: www.evestnik-mgou.ru (accessed: 12.12.2023).
5. Manoilo A. V., Strigunov K. S. Tekhnologii neklassicheskoi voiny. Genezis. Evolyutsiya. Praktika [Technologies of non-classical war. Genesis. Evolution. Practice]. Moscow, Goryachaya liniya-Telekom Publ., 2020. 378 p.
6. Ovchinskii V. S. Kriminologiya tsifrovogo mira [Criminology of the digital world]. Moscow, Norma Publ., INFRA-M Publ., 2018. 352 p.
7. Ratushnyak O. V., Kodrle I. A. Siriiskii krizis i pozitsiya Velikobritanii [The Syrian crisis and the British position]. In: Obshchestvo: filosofiya, istoriya, kul'tura [Society: philosophy, history, culture], 2019, no. 5, pp. 94–99.
8. Romachev R. V. [Proxy intelligence and classification of intelligence actors using the example of the USA]. In: Voprosy politologii [Political Science Issues], 2022, vol. 12, no. 12, pp. 4392–4406.
9. Sebekin S. A. [Choosing between persistent engagement and deterrence in the American cybersecurity strategy]. In: Mezhdunarodnye protsessy [International Trends], 2020, vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 96–125.
10. Strigunov K. S., Manoilo A. V. [“Checkmate Maduro” strategy as the basis for Operation Gideon]. In: Mezhdunarodnaya zhizn' [The International Affairs], 2021, no. 3, pp. 56–71.
11. Strigunov K. S., Manoilo A. V., Petrenko A. I. Narkokarteli i kriminal'nye seti. Rassvet temnoi globalizatsii [Drug cartels and criminal networks. The dawn of dark globalization]. Moscow, Goryachaya liniya-Telekom Publ., 2022. 304 p.
12. Terentyev V. O. [The British Component of the 2011 Military Intervention in Libya]. In: Istoriya [Istoriya], 2021, vol. 12, no. 1. Available at: www.history.jes.su (accessed: 03.01.2024).
13. Fukuyama F. The Great Disruption (Rus. ed.: Aleksandrova A. V., transl. Velikii razryv. Moscow, AST Publ., 2003. 474 p.).
14. Tchernega V. N. [France and armed conflicts in Africa]. In: Aktual'nye problemy Evropy [Current problems of Europe], 2018, no. 4, pp. 103–115.
15. Shupitskaya O. N. [Constitutional values: concept, system, problems of incarnations]. In: Vestnik Grodnenskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta imeni Yanki Kupaly. Seriya 4: Pravovedenie [Vesnik of Yanka Kupala State University of Grodno. Series 4: Jurisprudence], 2019, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 13–19.
16. Degang S., Zoubir Y. Sentry Box in the Backyard: Analysis of French Military Bases in Africa. In: Journal of Middle Eastern and Islamic Studies (in Asia, 2011, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 82–104.
17. Delanoe I. France’s approach to the Syria conflict and the Russia factor. In: Puti k miru i bezopasnosti [Pathways to Peace and Security], 2019, no. 1, pp. 47–54.
18. Jones N., Chindea I., Weizs D., et al. A Social Network Analysis of Mexico’s Dark Network Alliance Structure. In: Journal of Strategic Security, 2022, vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 76–105.
19. Kenney M. The Architecture of Drug Trafficking: Network Forms of Organisation in the Colombian Cocaine Trade. In: Global Crime, 2007, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 233–259.
20. Kuperman A. A Model Humanitarian Intervention? Reassessing NATO's Libya Campaign. In: International Security, 2013, vol. 38, no. 1, pp. 105–136.
Supplementary files
Review
Views:
180
Email this article 