Preview

Russian Social and Humanitarian Journal

Advanced search

PRINCIPLE OF DIRECT ACTION OF THE RIGHT OF THE EUROPEAN UNION

https://doi.org/10.18384/2224-0209-2011-2-508

Abstract

Character of intercommunication and co-operation of right for European Union and national right, researchers, is determined in this article, right, notice that in a practical plan realization of principle of direct action of right, along with principle of his supremacy, means «for physical and legal persons there is possibility to lean against a right for associations and labour for his realization through the courts of gosudarstv-chlenov», and for the European law and order is his assertion and development.

About the Author

M. .. Marchenko

Russian Federation


References

1. Micklitz H. The Politics of Judicial Cooperation in the EU. Cambridge.2005.

2. Judment of 25 February 1988. Case 249/83. Les Verts - Parti Ecologiste V.Parlement.(1988). ECR 1017.

3. Топорнин Б.Н. Европейское право. М., 1998.

4. Edward D., Lane R. European Community Law. An introduction. Edinburgh, 1995.

5. Договор, учреждающий Европейское сообщество. Ст. 249. - В кн.: Европейское право. Рук. авт.колл. и отв. ред. Энтин Л.М., - 2004.

6. Judge St. Business Law. L., 1999.

7. Гарниг Г., Витницкая О. Право Европейского Союза. М., 2005.

8. Case 152/84 (1986). ECR 723; Case С-91/92 (1994). ECR 1 - 3325.

9. Prechal S. Directives in EC Law. Oxford. 2005.

10. Case 103/88 Constanzo (1989). ECR 1839.

11. ibid., P. 241.

12. Case 158/80 Butter-buying cruises (1981). ECR 1805.

13. Bennion F. Understanding Common Law Legislation. Oxford. 2001.

14. Collins L. European Community Law in the United Kingdom. L.,1990.

15. Право Европейского Союза. Под ред. Кашкина С.Ю.

16. Договор о Европейском Союзе. Ст. 34,п.п. «в», «с».- В кн. Горниг Г., Витвицкая О. Право Европейского Союза. М.,2005.

17. Горниг Г., Витвицкая О. Право Европейского Союза.

18. Claudina R. the Supremacy of Community Law Before the French Constitutional Court. - European Law Revieew. 2006. Vol. 31. № 4. P.P. 499-516; Schiek D. Private Rule - making and European Yovernance - issues of legitimacy.- European Law Review. 2007. Vol. № 4.

19. McCormick J.The European Union Politics and Policies. Cambridge. 2004. P.P. 188-191; Горниг Г., Витвицкая О. Указ. соч.

20. Lenaerts K. Nuffel P. Constitutional Law of the European Union. L. 2005.

21. Lenaerts K. Nuffel P. Op. cit.

22. Case 13/68: Salgoil SpA v. Italian Ministry of Foreign Frade (1968). ECR 453-461; Case 203/80: Re casati (1981). ECR 2595, 2615; Case 126/86 Jimenez Zaera v. instituto Nacional de la Seguridade Social (1989). CMLR 827; etc.

23. Micklitz H. The politics of Judicial Co-operation in the EU. Cambridje. 2005. 2005.

24. Collins L. European Communiy Law in the United Kingdom L., 1990.

25. Право Европейского Союза. Под ред. Кашкина.

26. Case 2/74 Reyners (1974). ECR 631; Case 43/75 Defrenne (1876).

27. Lenaerts K., Nuffel P. Constitutional Law of the European Union. L.,2005.

28. Prechal S. directives in ES Law. Oxford. 2005. P.P. 221-222.

29. Prechal S. Op. cit. P. 221.

30. Judje St. Business Law. L., 1999. P.P. 16-17; Peterson J. and Shackleton M. The institutions of the European Union. Oxford. 2002. P.P. 129-131; Lewis C. Judicial Remedies in Public Law. L.,2004. P.P. 577-583; etc.

31. Case 45/75. Rewe-Zentrale V. HZA Landau - Platz (1976). ECR 181-198; Case 43/75. Defrenne V. SA SABENA (1976). ECR 455; etc.


Review

Views: 260


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2224-0209 (Online)