ON THE ISSUE OF INCREASING THE POLITICAL SUBJECTIVITY OF THE STATE DUMA OF THE VIIICONVOCATION
https://doi.org/10.18384/2224-0209-2022-1-1104
Abstract
Aim. Analysis of the election of the deputies of the State Duma of the Federal Assembly of the Russian Federation of the 8th convocation and the impact of the work of the parliament on the approval indicators of this political institution.
Methodology. As part of the preparation of the article, the following empirical methods were used: regulatory analysis of changes in legislation on the election of deputies of the State Duma of the Federal Assembly of the Russian Federation of the VIII convocation, comparative analysis of the results of elections to the parliament of previous convocations and their impact on the configuration of the legislative body, secondary analysis of data from a sociological survey on confidence in the activities of political institutions.
Results. The necessity of increasing of political subjectivity of the State Duma as a condition for strengthening confidence in parliament is shown.
Research implications. The data on the results of the elections of deputies of the State Duma of the Federal Assembly of the Russian Federation of the VIII convocation are summarized, general trends in the work of the parliament are predicted, taking into account the changed political configuration of the parliament.
About the Author
M. Voropaeva
Financial University under the Government of the Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Maria A. Voropaeva – Postgraduate Student, Department of Political Science
125993, Moscow, Leningradskiy prosp., 49
References
1. Avak’yan S. A. [Elections in Russia: the evolution of electoral systems, modern problems]. In: Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Seriya 11: Pravo [The Moscow University Bulletin. Series 11. Law], 2015, no. 5, pp. 23–39.
2. Ezhov D. A. [Elections of deputies of the State Duma of the Russian Federation of the eighth convocation: trends and forecasts]. In: Vlast’ [The Authority], 2021, vol. 29, no. 3, pp. 91–93.
3. Levashov V. K., Velikaya N. M. [Russia’s Public Legitimacy in the Pandemic and the State Duma Elections]. In: Sotsial’noe prostranstvo [Social area], 2021, vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 1–14. DOI:10.15838/sa.2021.4.31.4
4. Medushevskii A. N. [Constitutional amendments in Russia in 2020 as a political project of the state reorganization]. In: Publichnaya politika [Public policy], 2020, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 43–66.
5. Slin’ko E. A., Antonov A. V. [Transformation of political power in Russia: constitutional reform and parliamentary elections in the light of the theory of separation of powers]. In: Region: sistemy, ekonomika, upravlenie [Region: systems, economics, management], 2021, no. 3, pp. 133–138.
6. Falaleev M. A., Sitdikova N. A. [State Duma’s Elections of the VIII convocation. Forecast of political system’s stability]. In: Sotsiosfera [Sociosphere], 2020, no. 1, pp. 170–175.
7. Shlychkov V. V. [The Russian electoral cycle of 2021 and its impact on the ongoing socio-economic processes and the state of the national economy]. In: Vestnik ekonomiki, prava i sotsiologii [The Review of Economy, the Law and Sociology], 2021, no. 3, pp. 44–48.
8. Pyrma R. V., Alekseev R. A., Abramov A. V., et al. Elektoral’nye protsessy v sovremennom mire [Electoral Processes in the Modern World]. Moscow, KnoRus Publ., 2020. 492 p.
9. Bourdieu P. Choses dites. Paris, Minuit, 1987. 229 p.
Review
Views:
407
Email this article 