Preview

Russian Social and Humanitarian Journal

Advanced search

The Theme of Pseudo-Revolutions in the Works of Modern Researchers

https://doi.org/10.18384/2224-0209-2026-2-1816

Abstract

Aim. To conceptualise the phenomenon of revolutionary imitations (pseudo-revolutions) in the modern world.
Methodology. The key research method was the analysis of texts. The analysis of the authors’ works related to the description of revolutionary processes and the evolution of its content in relation to modern processes of imitation of social changes in the context of postmodernism as the cultural logic of late capitalism was carried out.
Results. The qualitative difference between the phenomenon of pseudo-revolutions and classical revolutions, its main characteristics and prerequisites for its emergence, associated with the peculiarities of the socio-economic structure of postmodern society, are revealed.
Research implications consist in classifying the attitude of modern researchers towards pseudo-revolution and outlining the main possibilities for further conceptualisation of this phenomenon within the framework of social sciences.

About the Author

Ruslan V. Golovlеv
Lomonosov Moscow State University
Russian Federation

Postgraduate Student, Department of History and Theory of Politics, Faculty of Political Science



References

1. Arendt, H. (2011). On Revolution. Moscow: Evropa publ. (in Russ.).

2. Baisha, O. (2021). Discursive Fracture of the Social Field: Lessons of Euromaidan. Moscow: Higher School of Economics publ. (in Russ.).

3. Baudrillard, J. (2000). In the Shadow of the Silent Majorities, Or, the End of the Social. Yekaterinburg: Ural University publ. (in Russ.).

4. Volkov, V. V. (2025). The Deep State and the Revolution of the Techno-Optimists. In: Russia in Global Affairs, 23 (4), 27–37 (in Russ.).

5. Davydov, D. A. (2025). The Impossibility of Socialism. Leftist Ideas in the Service of the New Elites. Moscow: RIPOL classic publ. (in Russ.).

6. Davydov, D. (2021). Postcapitalism and the Birth of the Personaliat. Moscow: RIPOL classic publ. (in Russ.).

7. Inglehart, R. & Welzel, K. (2011). Modernization, Cultural Change and Democracy: The Human Development Sequence. Moscow: Novoye izdatelstvo publ. (in Russ.).

8. Kapustin, B. G. (2019). Reflections on the “End of the Revolution.” Moscow: Gaidar Institute publ. (in Russ.).

9. Kapustin, B. G. (2024). Taming the Negative. Critique of Modernity. Yerevan: Fortis Press publ. (in Russ.).

10. Crouch, K. (2010). Post-Democracy. Moscow: Higher School of Economics publ. (in Russ.).

11. Skocpol, T. (2017). States and Social Revolutions: A Comparative Analysis of France, Russia, and China. Moscow: Gaidar Institute publ. (in Russ.).

12. Huntington, S. (2004). Political Order in Changing Societies. Moscow: Progress-Tradition publ. (in Russ.).

13. Schultz, E. E. (2022). Theory of Revolution: Revolutions and Modern Civilizations. Moscow: LENAND publ. (in Russ.).


Review

Views: 127

JATS XML


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2224-0209 (Online)