THE IMPACT OF GLOBALIZATION ON THE LEVELS OF THE POLITICAL PROCESS
https://doi.org/10.18384/2224-0209-2025-4-1638
Abstract
Aim. To identify how globalization generally influences the levels of the conceptual three-level model of the political process.
Methodology. The author has conceptualized the political process as a three-level model to focus on the analysis of the influence of the globalization process on the agent (micro-level), constitutive (meso-level) and metapolitical (macro-level) levels of the political process.
Results. It has been established that at the constitutive level of the political process globalization leads to changes in the system of institutions which lead to a process of institutional unification and a converse process of fragmentation. At the metapolitical level the process of globalization affects the sovereignty of the political system through the emergence of new supra-systemic players on the global stage.
Research implications. The conceptual model of the political process has been introduced, and the main trends in the development of the political process under globalization have been identified in relation to this model.
About the Author
Dmitriy V. Afonin
Lomonosov Moscow State University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Postgraduate student, Assistant, Department of History and Theory of Politics, Faculty of Political Science
References
1. Althusser, L. (2011). Ideology and Ideological State Apparatuses. In: Emergency Reserve, 3, 14–58 (in Russ.).
2. Amin, S. (2007). The Liberal Virus: Permanent War and the Americanization of the World. Moscow: Evropa publ. (in Russ.).
3. Beck, U. (2001). What is Globalization? Moscow: Progress-Tradition publ. (in Russ.).
4. Bekirova, F. S. (2018). State Sovereignty in the Context of Globalization: Concept and Modern Interpretation. In: North Caucasian Legal Vestnik, 4, 78–86 (in Russ.).
5. Shcherbina, A. K., Rodygina, N. Yu., Moleva S. V. & Obukhovskaya, L. A. (2024). Key Trends in World Trade Development in 2024. In: Education and Law, 5, 25–33 (in Russ.).
6. Panarin, A. S. (2002). The Temptation of Globalism. Moscow: Eksmo publ. (in Russ.).
7. Polozhihina, M. A. (2023). Features of Modern Migrations and Their Consequences. In: Social Novelties and Social Sciences, 1, 20–37 (in Russ.).
8. Ferguson, N. (2022). Civilization. The West and the Rest. Moscow: AST publ. (in Russ.).
9. Shutov, A. Yu. (1994). Political Process. M.: Moscow University publ. (in Russ.).
10. Afonaseva, A. (2024). The Role of the Capital of the Chinese Diaspora in the Economic Development of the PRC during the Reform Period (1979 – early 2020s). In: Population and Economics, 8, 19–36.
11. Aydın, Y. (2014). The New Turkish Diaspora Policy: Its Aims, Their Limits and the Challenges for Associations of People of Turkish Origin and Decision-Makers in Germany. In: SWP Research Paper, 10, 1–28.
12. Keohane, R. O. & Nye, J. S. (2012). Power and Interdependence: World Politics in Transition. London: Longman.
13. Lodhi, I. (2021). Globalisation and Public Policy: Bridging the Disciplinary and Epistemological Boundaries. In: Policy and Society, 40 (4), 522–544.
14. Moyer, J. D., Turner, S. D. & Meisel, C. J. (2021). What are the Drivers of Diplomacy? Introducing and Testing New Annual Dyadic Data Measuring Diplomatic Exchange. In: Journal of Peace Research, 58 (6), 1300–1310.
Supplementary files
Review
Views:
13
Email this article 