FORMATION OF THE CITY: FROM INTERESTED COMMUNICATION TO POLITICAL READING AND DEVELOPMENT
https://doi.org/10.18384/2224-0209-2023-4-1368
Abstract
Aim. To identify the mechanisms of city formation as a political and administrative unit by considering the practices of interested communication, as well as political interpretation and development of urban space and its resources.
Methodology. The main content of the study is an analysis of approaches to assessing the formation of municipal space in the context of the political self-organization of local communities (functional, cross-functional aspects) and the organization of their living environment.
Results. In the course of the study, the peculiarities of the space organization of modern cities were identified, related to the political practices of interested communication, symbolic definition and actual transformation of space by individual and collective subjects of communities.
Research implications. The results of the research represent the author’s contribution to the development of the theory of community self-organization and political urbanism, they can be used in municipal and regional political campaigns.
About the Author
Ilya A. Khabarov
Derzhavin Tambov State University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Cand. Sci. (Political Sciences), Director of the Center for Relations with Public Institutions, Department for Strategic Communications
References
1. Anderson B. Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism (Rus. ed.: Nikolaeva V. G., transl. Voobrazhaemye soobshchestva: razmyshleniya ob istokakh i rasprostranenii natsionalizma. Moscow, Kanon-Press-Ts Publ., Kuchkovo Pole Publ., 2001. 286 p.).
2. Arkhangelskaya K. V. [The symbolic power of brands in the modern sociocultural situation]. In: Nauka i sovremennost' [Science and modernity], 2016, no. 48, pp. 25–28.
3. Bayzhanova G. A. [Spatial self-organization of the population of large cities: a socio-cultural aspect]. In: Universum: obshchestvennye nauki: elektronnyi nauchnyi zhurnal [Universum: social sciences: electronic scientific journal], 2020, no. 3. Available at: www.7universum.com (accessed: 07.09.2023).
4. Bourdieu P. Espace social: champs et pratiques (Rus. ed.: Shmatko N. A., transl. Sotsial'noe prostranstvo: polya i praktiki. Moscow, Institut eksperimentalnoi sotsiologii Publ., St. Petersbyrg, Aleteya Publ., 2005. 576 p.).
5. Bourdieu P. Sociologie de l'espace social (Rus. ed.: Shmatko N. A., transl. Sotsial'noe prostranstvo: polya i praktiki. Moscow, Institut eksperimentalnoi sotsiologii Publ., St. Petersbyrg, Aleteya Publ., 2007. 288 p.).
6. Vendina O. I. [Urban planning and spontaneous spacial order: the post-Soviet transformation of spatial guidelines for the development of Moscow]. In: Gorodskie issledovaniya i praktiki [Urban Studies and Practices], 2023, vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 29–53.
7. Gainutdinova L. A., Nevzorov M. V., eds. Gorod. Sreda. Politika. 2018: cbornik materialov nauchno-prakticheskoi konferentsii, Sankt-Peterburg, 14–15 dekabrya 2018 g. [City. Wednesday. Policy. 2018: collection of materials from the scientific and practical conference, St. Petersburg, December 14–15, 2018]. St. Petersburg, Izdatelstvo RGPU im. A. I. Gertsena Publ., 2019. 116 p.
8. Goriacheva O. E., Govorina O. V., Globa S. B. [Formation of the urban milieu as a key condition for the formation of people’s quality of life (Russia, Krasnoyarsk)]. In: Problemy sovremennoi ekonomiki [Problems of modern economics], 2020, no. 3, pp. 150–154.
9. Danilova O. V. [Stages of development of agglomerations and advantages of agglomeration structure of the territory of settlements]. In: Molodoi uchenyi [Young scientist], 2022, no. 11, pp. 102–105.
10. Zhurbina I. V. [Boundaries of the definition of “political” in the economic reality structures]. In: Vestnik Udmurtskogo universiteta. Seriya: Filosofiya. Psihologiya. Pedagogika [Bulletin of Udmurt University. Series Philosophy. Psychology. Pedagogy], 2018, vol. 28, no. 3, pp. 271–277.
11. Karmadonov O. A. [Sociology of the symbol]. In: Monitoring obshchestvennogo mneniya: ekologicheskiye I sotsialniye peremeny [Monitoring of Public opinion: economic and social changes], 2004, no. 3, pp. 106–113.
12. Castells M. The Information Age: Economy, Society and Culture (Rus. ed.: Shkaratan O. I., ed. Informatsionnaya epokha: ekonomika, obshchestvo i kul'tura. Moscow, GU VSHE Publ., 2000. 608 p.).
13. Krutskikh P. Yu. [Skateboarding as a tool for reading the city]. In: Monitoring obshchestvennogo mneniya: ekologicheskiye I sotsialniye peremeny [Monitoring of Public opinion: economic and social changes], 2019, no. 1, pp. 292–310.
14. Lefebvre H. [Espace social]. In: Neprikosnovennyi zapas [Emergency ration], 2010, no. 2. Available at: www. magazines.gorky.media (accessed: 15.01.2023).
15. Lisovets I. M. [Current artistic practices in the transformation of a post-socialist city]. In: Burlina E., Ilivitskaya L., Kuzovenkova Yu., eds. Gorod i vremya. T. 2 [City and time. Vol. 2]. Samara, Kniga Publ., 2012, pp. 74–77.
16. Lukes S. Power: A Radical View (Rus. ed.: Kyrlezhev A. I., transl. Vlast': radikal'nyi vzglyad. Moscow, Izdatel'skii dom Gosudarstvennogo universiteta Vysshei shkoly ekonomiki Publ., 2010. 240 p.
17. Malaya E. V. [Symbolic space of a small town]. In: Architecture and Modern Information Technologies, 2023, no. 2, pp. 154–165.
18. Mukhametov D. R. [Creating sustainable smart cities: technologies for citizens’ engagement and collaborative experimentation]. In: Voprosy innovatsionnoi ekonomiki [Russian journal of innovation economics], 2022, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 843–858.
19. Nevostrueva K. N. [Symbolic space of a city: the review of ideas and approaches]. In: Vestnik Permskogo natsional'nogo issledovatel'skogo politekhnicheskogo universiteta. Sotsial'no-ekonomicheskie nauki [PNRPU sociology and economics bulletin], 2016, no. 2, pp. 113–121.
20. Pyastolov S. S., Tepomes Yu. A. [Analysis of the effective development of the physical, social and symbolic spaces of the city in the 21st century (on the example of the city of Magnitogorsk)]. In: Gipoteza [Hypothesis], 2022, no. 3, pp. 73–79.
21. Revyakina N. P., Kuryanov N. A. [“City as a text” (based on the material from Rostov-on-Don)]. In: Russian Linguistic Bulletin, 2023, no. 7. Available at: www.rulb.org (accessed: 07.09.2023).
22. Trubina E. [Major-events: cities between the challenges of globalization and the interests of the population]. In: Otechestvennye zapiski [Domestic notes], 2012, no. 3, pp. 108–119.
23. Harvey D. Social Justice and the City (Rus. ed.: Gerasimova E. Yu., transl. Sotsial'naya spravedlivost' i gorod. Moscow, Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie Publ., 2018. 440 p.).
24. Harvey D. The Right to the City (Rus. ed.: Kotlyarova M. A., transl. Pravo na gorod. Ekaterinburg, 2019. 36 p.).
25. Després C., Vachon G., Fortin A. Implementing Transdisciplinarity: Architecture and Urban Planning At Work. In: Janssens N., Doucet I., éds. Transdisciplinary knowledge production in architecture and urbanism, in Urban and Landscape Perspectives. New York, Springer, 2011, pp. 33–49.
26. Nitzan J., Bichler Sh., eds. Capital as Power. A Study of Order and Creorder. Philadelphia, Routledge, 2009. 438 р.
27. Healey P. On Creating the ‘City’ as a Collective Resource. In: Urban Studies, 2002, vol. 39, no. 10, pp. 1777–1792.
28. Kingdon J. W. Agendas, Alternatives and Public Policies. Boston, Longman, 2011. 273 p.
29. Pinson D. Urban Planning: An ‘Undisciplined’ Discipline. In: Futures, Elsevier, 2004, no. 36, pp. 503–513.
30. Schugurensky D. Citizenship learning and democratic engagement. In: Political capital revisited. Vancouver, 2000, pp. 417–422.
31. Stigler G. J. The Economics of Information. In: Journal of Political Economy, 1961, no. 69, pp. 213–225
Supplementary files
Review
Views:
174
Email this article 