ASSIMILATION OF THE TERMS OF CHRISTIAN ARCHITECTURE IN THE RUSSIAN AND ENGLISH LANGUAGES (STRUCTURAL MORPHEME ANALYSIS)
https://doi.org/10.18384/2224-0209-2023-2-1338
Abstract
Aim. To systematize and classify the religious terms of architecture in accordance with the type of their assimilation in the recipient English and Russian languages.
Methodology. This work uses the common formal-structural, morphemic, and statistical analyses of special vocabulary units. The terms are viewed both in synchrony and diachrony.
Results. The work analyzed 50 Russian terms and 50 English ones. The article states the structural changes that occurred to them, or, as in the case of the “zero” group, their absence. There is a variety of assimilation processes in the terminology of two languages, according to which they were divided into the following groups: zero, complete, root, dropout, change, addition of inflection. The detailed results of the work are given at the end of the article.
Research implications. The study results may be of use of the terminologists to organize and systematize the process of loan words assimilation, to facilitate the process of transferring new lexical units in a more appropriate version of the recipient language. These results can be applied in the classes of linguistics, terminology and, possibly, architecture studies. The results of the work may be of interest in terminological translation and editing.
About the Author
Arevik D. Hovakimyan
Moscow Automobile and Road Construction State Technical University, Bronnitsy’s branch
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Cand. Sci. (Philology). Assoc. Prof., Department of Humanities
References
1. Vereshchagina I. M., Savintseva M. E. [Russian architectural and building terminology. Culturological aspect]. In: Filologicheskie nauki. Voprosy teorii i praktiki [Philology. Theory & Practice], 2016, no. 11, pp. 87–92.
2. Kaneeva A. V. [On the question of the influence of various languages on the formation of Russian military terminology (on examples of English and French)]. In: Gumanitarnye i sotsial’nye nauki [The Humanities and social sciences], 2019, no. 1, pp. 240–246.
3. Karapetyan T. A. [Features of translating of non-equivalent architectural terms from English into Russian]. In: Uspekhi gumanitarnykh nauk [Modern Humanities Success], 2021, no. 8, pp. 148–149.
4. Krasnokutskaya M. A. [Linguistic borrowing and its causes, based on the example of the English language]. In: Mezhdunarodnyi zhurnal gumanitarnykh i estestvennykh nauk [International Journal of Humanities and Natural Sciences], 2022, no. 10-2, pp. 177–179.
5. Kuznetsova N. G., Stepicheva O. N., Janowitz Ph. [International words in the architectural terminology of European languages (Romanesque architectural style)]. In: Filologicheskie nauki. Voprosy teorii i praktiki [Philology. Theory & Practice], 2021, vol. 4, iss. 9, pp. 2861–2870.
6. Lotte D. S. Voprosy zaimstvovaniya i uporyadocheniya inoyazychnykh terminov i terminoelementov [Issues of borrowing and organizing foreign language terms and term elements]. Moscow, Nauka Publ., 1982. 152 p.
7. Minasyan A. V. Semanticheskii analiz terminologii russkogo yazyka, zaimstvovannoi iz frantsuzskogo yazyka (na materiale literaturovedcheskoi, voennoi i arkhitekturnoi terminologii): avtoref. dis. … kand. filol. nauk [Semantic analysis of the terminology of the Russian language borrowed from the French language (based on literary, military and architectural terminologies): abstract of Cand. Sci. thesis in Philology]. Rostov-on-Don, 2003. 28 p.
8. Hovakimyan A. D. Arkhitekturnaya terminologiya kul’tovykh sooruzhenii v russkom, angliiskom i armyanskom yazykakh: dis. … kand. filol. nauk [Architectural terminology of religious buildings in Russian, English and Armenian languages: Cand. Sci. thesis in Philolology]. Moscow, 2018. 165 p.
9. Stamatiadu E. Leksiko-semanticheskie, strukturnye i funktsional’nye osobennosti arkhitekturnoi leksiki (na materiale angliiskogo, nemetskogo, grecheskogo i russkogo yazykov): avtoref. dis. … kand. filol. nauk [Lexico-semantic, structural and functional features of architectural vocabulary (based on the material of the English, German, Greek and Russian languages): abstract of Cand. Sci. thesis in Philolology]. Maikop, 2010. 23 p.
10. Trofimova N. A., Shchitova O. G. [Latest borrowings in Russian construction terminology of the 21st century]. In: Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta [Tomsk State University Journal], 2021, no. 470, pp. 50–61.
11. Figurny G. N. [On the origin of Architectural Design: Science vs Metaphysics]. In: Arkhitektura i sovremennye informatsionnye tekhnologii [Architecture and Modern Information Technologies], 2021, no. 4, pp. 70–83.
12. Shipitsyna O. A., Kondrashina S. V. [Interaction of information in texts on architectures]. In: Academia. Arkhitektura i stroitel’stvo [Academia. Architecture and Construction], 2012, no. 3, pp. 43–46.
13. Yakhina R. R., Afonina E. V. [Functionality of foreign-language inclusions in Russian-language texts (on the material of modern media)]. In: Litera, 2021, no. 5, pp. 33–39.
14. Ivanchenko M. The characteristics of English terms structure in architecture and construction industry. In: Periodyk naukowy akademii polonijnej, 2020, no. 1, pp. 41–45.
15. Sakaeva L., Bazarova L., Kalinina A., et al. English and Russian architectural and construction terminology: approaches to classification and systematization of terms. In: IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, vol. 890. Kazan, IOP Science, 2020, pp. 1–8.
Supplementary files
Review
Views:
405
Email this article 