IDEOLOGICAL FACTOR IN RUSSIAN FOREIGN POLICY: PROBLEMS AND PROSPECTS
https://doi.org/10.18384/2224-0209-2023-3-1328
Abstract
Aim. To examine possible variants of ideological concepts as state ideology of the modern Russian Federation and compare their foreign policy potential.
Methodology. The paper uses methods of comparative, historical and political analysis.
Results. The analysis concludes that none of the broad and narrow ideological conceptions used in recent decades is capable of becoming as significant a tool of Russia’s foreign policy as the communist ideology was in Soviet times. The reviewed ideological concepts are either too narrow in their target audience, or too widespread in the world and the international community does not recognize Russia as a leader in their implementation, or they are too controversial and have low potential attractiveness for other states in the light of more pressing issues of international relations and world development.
Research implications. The results of the study may be used as an important argument in the ongoing dispute in academic and political circles between supporters and opponents of introducing state ideology in Russia.
About the Author
Sergey A. SklyarovRussian Federation
Cand. Sci. (History), Assoc. Prof., Department of International Relations and Foreign Policy of Russia
References
1. Alieva S. A., Alieva S. T. [The idea of patriotic education as the basis of the Russian state ideology]. In: Problemy patrioticheskogo vospitaniya v sovremennom obrazovatel'nom prostranstve: materialy nauchno-prakticheskoi konferentsii, Makhachkala, 20–21 fevralya 2014 g. [Problems of patriotic education in the modern educational space: materials of the scientific and practical conference, Makhachkala, February 20–21, 2014]. Makhachkala, Dagestanskii gosudarstvennyi pedagogicheskii universitet Publ., 2014, pp. 15–22.
2. Bogatyrev K. A. [The main priorities of development of the state ideology in Russia]. In: Politika i obshchestvo [Politics and society], 2009, no. 7. Available at: www.nbpublish.com (accessed: 20.05.2023).
3. Butusova N. V. [State ideology of Russia: the concept, content, problems of formation and legal consolidation]. In: Vestnik Voronezhskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya: Pravo [Proceedings of Voronezh State University. Series: Law], 2006, no. 1, pp. 4–19.
4. Vlasova Yu. B. [Some problems of state ideology at the present stage of development of Russian statehood]. In: Yurist-Pravoved [Lawyer-Jurist], 2004, no. 2, pp. 70–72.
5. Voltaire O. V. Fenomen gosudarstvennoi ideologii kak dukhovno-politicheskoi osnovy gosudarstvennoi tselostnosti Rossii: istoriya i sovremennost' (politologicheskii aspekt): avtoreferat dis. … d-ra polit. nauk [The phenomenon of state ideology as the spiritual and political basis of the state integrity of Russia: history and modernity (political science aspect): abstract of Dr. Sci. thesis in Political Sciences]. Rostov-on-Don, 2010. 55 p.
6. Grishaeva L. E. [Long echo of the Soviet-Japanese war 1945]. In: Diplomaticheskaya sluzhba [Diplomatic Service], 2020, no. 4, pp. 18–41.
7. Egorov O. G. [Russia at the Crossroads: in Search of a state Ideology]. In: Vestnik Moskovskogo gosudarstvennogo gumanitarno-ekonomicheskogo instituta [Bulletin of the Moscow State Humanitarian and Economic Institute], 2014, no. 3, pp. 86–90.
8. Ermolaev V. V. [Inlegnality of state ideology as an institutional problem of functioning and development of the organizational culture of internal affairs]. In: Uchenye zapiski Krymskogo federal'nogo universiteta imeni V. I. Vernadskogo. Sociologiya. Pedagogika. Psihologiya [Scientific notes of the V. I. Vernadsky Crimean Federal University. Sociology. Pedagogy. Psychology], 2021, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 127–139.
9. Krizhanovskaya G. N. [To the question of necessity state ideology]. In: Mir politiki i sociologii [World of politics and sociology], 2019, no. 9, pp. 34–40.
10. Molodyakov V. E. [Historical memory of the Japanese]. In: Ezhegodnik Yaponiya [Yearbook Japan], 2008, no. 37, pp. 285–301.
11. Trushkov S. A. [Theoretical and legal aspects of the inclusion of the provisions of the concept "Moscow – the third Rome" in the state ideology of modern Russia]. In: Obshchestvo. Nauka. Innovatsii (NPK-2017): sbornik statei Vserossiiskoi ezhegodnoi nauchno-prakticheskoi konferentsii, Kirov, 01–29 aprelya 2017 g. [Society. The science. Innovations (NPK-2017): collection of articles of the All-Russian annual scientific and practical conference, Kirov, April 01–29, 2017]. Kirov, Vyatka State University Publ., 2017, pp. 6089–6094.
12. Fukuyama F. The end of history and the last man (Rus. ed.: Levin M. B., transl. Konets istorii i poslednii chelovek. Moscow, AST Publ., 2015. 259 p.).
13. Qingsun V. ["The Eurasian moment" and the construction of a new Eurasian space]. In: Svobodnaya mysl' [Free thought], 2017, no. 1, pp. 71–80.
14. Tsygankova M. M. [State ideology: methodology problems at the present stage]. In: Gumanitarnye, social'no-ekonomicheskie i obshchestvennye nauki [Humanities, socio-economic and social sciences], 2018, no. 11, pp. 65–70.
15. Shamakhov V. A. [On public administration and state ideology]. In: Upravlencheskoe konsul'tirovanie [Management consulting], 2021, no. 10, pp. 8–9.
16. Yurchenko V. M. [State ideology "Pro et contra"]. In: Traektorii politicheskogo razvitiya Rossii: instituty, proekty, aktory: materialy vserossiiskoi nauchnoi konferentsii RAPN s mezhdunarodnym uchastiem, Moskva, 6–7 dekabrya 2019 g. [Trajectories of political development in Russia: institutions, projects, actors: materials of the All-Russian scientific conference of the Russian Academy of Political Sciences with international participation, Moscow, December 6–7, 2019]. Moscow, Moscow Pedagogical State University Publ., 2019, pp. 455–456.
17. Chugrov S. V. [Rethinking the results of the World War II in contemporary Japan]. In: Polis. Politicheskie issledovaniya [Polis. Political Studies], 2020, no. 5, pp. 22–45.
18. Miroshnichenko T. M. [Directions of integration activities of the SCO countries]. In: Biznesinform [Business Inform], 2019, no. 3, pp. 32–36.