ELECTRONIC VOTING: A COMMUNICATION NETWORK THAT LINKS STATE AND SOCIETY
https://doi.org/10.18384/2224-0209-2022-4-1208
Abstract
Aim. To develop various approaches to the identification and critical understanding of the electronic voting as a new mechanism of political activity.
Methodology. The research is based on general scientific methods, such as comparative method of extrapolation and forecasting. In addition, we use systemic approach and method of participant observation.
Results. In our research work, we have introduced our own electronic voting model as a communication network that links the state and society. Its goal is to escalate people’s conventional political activity with the help of close control over the constituency.
Research implications. The results of our work contribute to the development of theories touching upon the problems of information-oriented society and political communication.
About the Author
Vladislav I. FedorovRussian Federation
Researcher
References
1. Alekseev R. A. [Blockchain Technology in Elections: Past, Present and Future]. In: Zhurnal politicheskih issledovanij [Journal of Political Research], 2020, vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 25–38. DOI: 10.12737/2587-6295-2020-25-38
2. Bell D. The coming of post-industrial society; a venture in social forecasting (Rus. ed.: Inozemtsev V. L., transl. Gryadushchee postindustrial'noe obshchestvo: opyt sotsial'nogo prognozirovaniya Moscow, Academia Publ., 1999. 783 p.).
3. Bykov I. A. [Government platforms in the system of national public communication]. In: Zhurnal politicheskih issledovanij [Journal of Political Research], 2021, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 45–56. DOI: 10.12737/2587-6295-2021-5-2-45-56
4. Bykov I. A., Kurushkin S. V. [Digital political communication in Russia: Values of humanism vs. technocratic approach]. In: Vestnik Rossijskogo universiteta druzhby narodov. Seriya: Politologiya [RUDN Journal of Political Science], 2022, vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 419–432.
5. Wiener N. Man Manager (Rus. ed.: Panfilov E. G., transl. Chelovek upravlyayushchij. St. Petersburg, Piter Publ., 2001. 288 p.).
6. Grachev M. N. [On the Relationship Between the Concepts of Agenda Setting and Framing]. In: Informacionnyj vek [Information Age], 2018, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 94–96.
7. Castells M. Communication Power (Rus. ed.: Tylevich N. M., transl. Vlast' kommunikatsii. Moscow, HSE University Publishing House, 2016. 564 p.).
8. Kirillova N. B. [Manuel Castells: Strategy of the internet culture of the information age]. In: Sovremennaya nauka: aktual'nye problemy teorii i praktiki. Seriya: Poznanie [Modern science: actual problems of theory and practice. Series: Cognition], 2021, no. 12, pp. 15–19. DOI: 10.37882/2500-3682.2021.12.11
9. McLuhan M. The Gutenberg galaxy: the making of typographic man (Rus. ed.: Yudin A., transl. Galaktika Guttenberga: Sotvorenie cheloveka pechatnoj kul'tury. Kiev, Nika-Centr Publ., 2004. 432 p.).
10. Melville A. Yu. Politicheskij atlas sovremennosti: Opyt mnogomernogo statisticheskogo analiza politicheskih sistem sovremennyh gosudarstv [Political Atlas of the Modern World: An Experiment in Multidimensional Statistical Analysis of the Political Systems of Modern States]. Moscow, MGIMO–Universitet Publ., 2007. 272 p.
11. Melville A. Yu., Mironyuk M. G. [“Political Atlas of the Modern World” Revisited]. In: Polis. Politicheskie issledovaniya [Polis. Political Studies], 2020, no. 6, pp. 41–61. DOI: 10.17976/jpps/2020.06.04
12. Pustoshinskaya O.S. Jihadist Terrorism as a Counter-Power: Explication in the Logic of Manuel Castells’ Communication Network Concept. In: Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Filosofiya. Sociologiya. Politologiya [Tomsk State University Journal of Philosophy, Sociology and Political Science], 2019, no. 51, pp. 183–191. DOI: 10.17223/1998863Х/51/19
13. Rosenvalds Yu. [The Problem of "De-sealing" the Political Elite of Latvia and Estonia: Prospects of the Russian-speaking Minority]. In: Comparative Politics, 2012, no. 3, pp. 43–59.
14. Toffler A. The Third Wave (Rus. ed.: Burmistrov K. Yu., transl. Tret'ya volna. Moscow, AST Publ., 2010. 784 p.).
15. Fedorchenko S. N. [Analysis of Post-Soviet Countries Through the Lens of Communicative Theories of Power Manuel Castells]. In: Postsovetskie issledovaniya [Post-Soviet studies], 2018, vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 242–250.
16. Foucault M. Surveiller et punir. Naissance de la prison (Rus. ed.: Naumov V., transl. Nadzirat' i nakazyvat'. Rozhdenie tyur'my. Moscow, Ad Marginem Press Publ., 2018. 416 p.).
17. Kharichev A.D, Shutov A.Yu., Polosin A.V., Sokolova E.N. Perception of basic values, factors and structures socio-historical development of Russia (based on research and testing materials). In: Zhurnal politicheskih issledovanij [Journal of Political Research] 2022. Vol. 6. №3. pp. 9-19. DOI: 10.12737/2587-6295-2022-6-3-9-19
18. Almond G., Verba S. The Civic Culture. Boston, Princeton University Press, 1965. 574 p.
19. Enguehard C. Blockchain and Electronic Voting. In: Technologie de l'information, culture & société, 2019, no. 124. Available at: https://journals.openedition.org/terminal/4190 (accessed: 10.04.2022).
20. Habermas J. Between Facts and Norms: Contributions to a Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy. Cambridge (MA), MIT Press, 1996. 631 p.
21. Innis H. The Bias of Communication. Toronto, Toronto University Press, 2008. 304 p.
22. Masuda Y. The Information Society as Post-Industrial Society. Washington, World Future Society, 1980. 171 p.
23. Oostveen A.-M., Besselaar P. Security as belief User’s perceptions on the security of electronic voting systems. In: Electronic voting in Europe – Technology, law, politics and society, workshop of the ESF TED programme together with GI and OCG, 2004, no. 47, pp. 73–82.
24. Parsons T. On the Concept of Political Power. In: Proceeding of the American Philosophical Society, 1963, vol. 107, no. 3, pp. 232–262.
25. Weber M. Politics as a vocation. In: Weber M. Essays in Sociology. New York, Oxford University Press, 1946, pp. 77–128.
26. Zuboff S. Big Other: Surveillance Capitalism and the Prospects of an Information Civilization. In: Journal of Information Technology, 2015, no. 30, pp. 75–89. DOI: 10.1057/jit.2015.5