ON SOME LINGUISTIC PHENOMENA IN THE PORTRAIT LINGUISTIC PERSONALITY OF A POLITICIAN
https://doi.org/10.18384/2224-0209-2022-4-1194
Abstract
Aim. To identify the main features of the language tools used in the formation of the concept of "linguistic personality of a politician" in English-language sources.
Methodology. The complex methodology includes cognitive-discursive analysis, contextual analysis, and comparative method. The main content of the study is the analysis of English-language texts of a linguo-politological nature and texts of speeches by politicians.
Results. The analysis has shown that modern politicians use a variety of linguistic means in their stylistic and functional features to create their image (statesman) and to obtain the expected results of their intentions to manipulate public consciousness.
Research implications. The theoretical significance of the conducted research can be determined by the fact that its results are able to supplement the information about the concept of “a language personality of a politician” available in a new emerging discipline – linguopolitology. The practical value in the possible application of the results obtained in university courses in general and private linguistics, in general and special lexicology, in the stylistics of the English language, etc.
About the Authors
Elena D. PavlychevaRussian Federation
Prof., Department of English Philology, Institute of Linguistics and Intercultural Communication
Elvira A. Sorokina
Russian Federation
Dr. Sci. (Philology), Prof., Department of English Philology, Institute of Linguistics
References
1. Apresyan K. G. [Positive and negative connotation of metaphors in political discoure of the United Kingdom]. In: Vestnik Moskovskogo gosudarstvennogo oblastnogo universiteta (elektronnyi zhurnal) [Bulletin of Moscow Region State University (e-journal)], 2020, no. 4. Available at: www.evestnik-mgou.ru (accessed: 01.09.2022).
2. Bulgakova Yu. S. [The Language of Leaders: Current Trends in the Analysis of Presidents' Speech]. In: Nauka na blago chelovechestva–2019: materialy Mezhdunarodnoi nauchnoi konferentsii molodykh uchenykh (stat'i prepodavatelei i aspirantov), Moskva, 15–26 aprelya 2019 g. [Science for the Benefit of Humanity-2019: Proceedings of the International Scientific Conference of Young Scientists (articles of teachers and graduate students), Moscow, April 15–26, 2019]. Moscow, MRSU Ed. off. Publ., 2019, pp. 66–71.
3. Ignatenko A. V., Dorofeeva E. A. [Political Metaphors in the Context of Stereotyping and Cognitive Distortions]. In: Politicheskaya lingvistika [Political Linguistics], 2022, no. 3, pp. 27–38.
4. Komarova Z. I. [Linguopolitology as a particular paradigm of present-day linguistics: methodological aspect]. In: Politicheskaya lingvistika [Political Linguistics], 2012, no. 4, pp. 23–33.
5. Pavlycheva E. D. Lingvisticheskaya osnova rechevykh portretov v politicheskoi sfere [Linguistic basis of speech portraits in the political sphere]. Moscow, MRSU Ed. off. Publ., 2019. 212 p.
6. Ball A. R., Peters B. G. Modern Politics & Government. London, Macmillan Press, 2000. 339 р.
7. Beard A. The Language of Politics. London, Routledge, 2000. 132 р.
8. Bulgakova Yu. S., Shabanova V. P., Eliseeva A. A. The language of leadership: analyzing public speeches of Presidents (literature review). In: Leadership for the Future Sustainable Development of Business and Education: 2017 Prague Institute for Qualification Enhancement (PRIZK) and International Research Centre (IRC) “Scientific Cooperation” International Conference, Prague, Springer-Verlag GmbH, 2018, pp. 69–77.
9. Charteris-Black J. Politicians and Rhetoric. New York, Palgrave Macmillan, 2011. 370 р.
10. Frank M. The political aspects of the new French mentality. Paris, Logos, 1994. 357 p.
11. Gibbs R. W. Jr. Process and products in making sense of tropes. In: Ortony A., ed. Metaphor and Thought. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1993, pp. 175 – 199.
12. Jones J., Wareing S. Language and Politics. In: Language, Society and Power. London, Routledge, 1999, pp. 31–47.
13. Kristeva Ju. Le langage, cet inconnu. Une initiation a la linguistique. Paris, Editions du Seuil, 1981. 327 р.
14. Kulo L. Linguistic features in political speeches. Lulea, LUT Press, 2009. 40 p.
15. Lakoff G., Johnson M. Metaphors We Live By. Chicago, The University of Chicago Press, 1980. 256 р.
16. Lakoff G. Metaphor and War: The Metaphor System Used to Justify War in the Gulf, 1991. Available at: https://georgelakoff.files.wordpress.com/2011/04 (accessed: 08.10.2022).
17. Blommaert J., Bulcaen C., eds. Political Linguistics. Brussels, Ed. of the University of Brussels, 1997. 312 р.