ABOUT SIGNS OF POPULISM
https://doi.org/10.18384/2224-0209-2020-3-1021
Abstract
Aim. Definition of the main features and properties of populism in the modern world. The article is designed to scientifically answer the questions: what is populism in the modern political world? Methodology. The study analyzed the work of political scientists on the problem of populism and the political practice of the populism manifestation in Western countries. Results. The conclusion is that, in a conceptual sense, populism is pointless and is a set of methods and means of public interaction between a politician and the people in order to obtain public support. To gain power and influence on the emotions of voters, populists are pursuing a policy characterized by eccentricity, appeal to the masses, focus on protecting the interests of the people, the opposite of the opinion of the elites. The demand for populism is due to cetain factors such as the crisis of representative power - parliaments and political parties, where the problem of migrants in EU is an important issue. Research implications. The research materials and theoretical results can be used primarily in political studies. They can also be applied in the development of specialized courses on modern globalization processes, political leadership, party development, as well as on the policy of multiculturalism. The provisions and conclusions proposed by the author can be used for further analysis of communicative practices aimed at improving the effectiveness of interaction between government bodies and society.
About the Author
A. S. Abramyan
Moscow Region State University
Russian Federation
References
1. Абрамян А. С. Генезис и развитие популизма в западных странах [Электронный ресурс] // Журнал политических исследований. 2019. Т. 3. № 2. URL: https://naukaru.ru/ru/nauka/issue/1724/view (дата обращения: 23.08.2019).
2. Аверин Ю. П., Солохин В. А. Особенности формирования популизма в деятельности представительного органа государственной власти: теоретико-методологический анализ // Вестник Московского университета. Серия 18: Социология и политология. 1998. № 1. С. 71-86.
3. Даль Р. Введение в теорию демократии / пер. с англ. М.: Наука: Квадрат, 1992. 160 с.
4. Лефор К. Политические очерки (XIX-XX вв.) / пер. с фр. Е. А. Самарской. М.: РОССПЭН, 2000. 368 с.
5. Малько А. В. Популизм как тормоз демократии // Общественные науки и современность. 1994. № 1. С. 104-111.
6. Arter D. The Breakthrough of Another West European Populist Radical Right Party? The Case of the True Finns // Government and Opposition. 2010. Vol. 45. № 4. Р. 486-504.
7. Canovan M. Trust the People! Populism and the Two Faces of Democracy // Political Studies. 1999. Vol. 47. № 1. Р. 2-16.
8. Corbetta P., Vignati R. Direct Democracy and Scapegoats: the Five Star Movement and Europe // The International Spectator. 2014. Vol. 49. № 1. Р. 53-64.
9. Inglehart R. Cognitive mobilization and European identity // Comparative Politics. 1970. Vol. 3. № 1. P. 4-7.
10. Priester K. Wesensmerkmale des Populismus // Aus Polititik und Zeitgesschichte. 2012. № 5-6. P. 3-9.
Views:
393