POLITICAL INTERNET-COMMUNICATIONS IN MODERN PUBLIC DISCOURSE: THE PROBLEM OF CONTEXTUALIZATION
https://doi.org/10.18384/2224-0209-2017-4-839
Abstract
The paper is devoted to the analysis of the phenomenon of political Internet communications in the context of modern discursive trends. The author focuses on the problem of the possibility of using political Internet communications as an indicator of the development of public administration. The applied research methodology consists in analyzing the phenomenon of political Internet communications through the prism of the linguistic and political context. The author comes to conclusions about the variability of communication models that do not allow to establish a universal rating of the development of political Internet communications around the world. For each country it is necessary to describe specific contextual conditions of both communication links and political traditions development.
References
1. Грачев М.Н. Политическая коммуникация: теоретические концепции, модели, векторы развития. М.: Прометей, 2004. 328 c.
2. Песков Д.Н. Интернет в мировой политике: формы и вызовы // Современные международные отношения и мировая политика / отв. ред. А.В. Торкунов. М.: Просвещение, 2004. С. 222-246.
3. Шубенкова А.Ю., Колозариди П.В. Интернет как предмет социальной политики в официальном дискурсе России: благо или угроза? // Журнал исследований социальной политики. 2016. Т. 14. № 1. С. 39-54.
4. Atef Oden AbuSa’aleek Internet Linguistics: A Linguistic Analysis of Electronic Discourse as a New Variety of Language // International Journal of English Linguistics. 2015. Vol. 5. № 1. Р. 135-145.
5. Baron J. Criteria and explenations // Behavioral and Brain Science. 1984. Iss. 2. Vol. 7. P. 287-288.
6. Budd L., Harris L. Introduction: Managing governance or governance management. Is it all in a digital day’s work? // E-Governance: Managing or Governing? / eds. L. Budd, L. Harris. New York: Routledge, 2009. P. 5-25.
7. Castells M. The Internet Galaxy: Reflections on the Internet, Business, and Society. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001. 292 р.
8. Chadwick A. E-Government and E-Democracy: A Case For Convergence? [Электронный ресурс]. URL: http://195.130.-87.21:8080/dspace/bitstream/123456789/964/1/E-government%20-and%20e-democracy%20a%20case%20for%20convergence.pdf (дата обращения: 30.06.2017).
9. Chadwick A. Internet Politics: States, Citizens, and New Communication Technologies. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006. 400 р.
10. Сrystal D. Language and The Internet. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001. 256 p.
11. Fisher E. E-Governance and E-Democracy: Questioning Technology-Centered Categories // The Oxford Handbooks of Governance. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012. P. 569-583.
12. Fountain J. Information, Institutions and Governance: Advancing a Basic Social Science Research Program for Digital Government. Available at: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstr-act_id=430521&rec=1&srcabs=1570134&alg=7&pos=1 (accessed: 25.06.2017).
13. Hai J.C. Fundamental of Development Administration. Selangor: Scholar Press, 2007. 214 р.
14. Herring S.C. Computer-Mediated Discourse // The Handbook of discourse analysis / eds. D. Schiffrin, D. Tannen, H. Hamilton. Hoboken: Wiley-Blackwell, 2001. P. 612-634.
15. Internet World Stats. Russia [Электронный ресурс]. URL: http://www.internetworldstats.com/euro/ru.htm (дата обращения: 15.06.2017).
16. Jeong J., Einhorn Z., Mathur P., Chen L., Lee S., Kawakami K., Guo S. Patterning the zebrafish diencephalon by the conserved zinc-finger protein Fezl [Электронный ресурс] // Development (Cambridge, England) (Journal). 2007. № 134 (1). Р. 127-136. URL: https://zfin.org/ZDB-PUB-061227-40 (дата обращения: 26.06.2017).
17. Johnson J.A. The illiberal culture of e-democracy // Journal of E-Government. 2006. № 3. Р. 85-112.
18. McCullagh K. E-democracy: Potential for political revolution? // International Journal of Law and Information Technology. 2003. № 11. Р. 149-161.
19. Murray D.E. Composition as conversation: The computer terminal as medium of communication // Writing in nonacademic settings / eds. L. Odell, D. Goswami. New York: Guilford, 1985. Р. 205-229.
20. Ndou V. E-government for developing countries: opportunities and challenges // The Electronic Journal on Information Systems in Developing Countries. 2004. Vol. 18. № 1. URL: http://www.is.ci-tyu.edu.hk/staff/isrobert/ejisdc/18-1.pdf (дата обращения: 25.05.2017).
21. Norris D.F., Kraemer K.L. Mainframe and PC computing in American local governments: Myths and realities [Электронный ресурс] // Public Administration Review. 1996. Vol. 56. № 6. URL: https://www.questia.com/read/1G1-19307906/mainframe-and-pc-computing-in-american-cities-myths (дата обращения: 15.05.2017).
22. Ntulo G., Otike J. E-Government: its role, importance and challenges [Электронный ресурс] // School of Information Sciences at the Moi University. URL: https://www.researchgate.net/file.PostFile-Loader.html?id=564b965d6225ffe6e98b4595&assetKey=AS:296884838125570@1447794269180 (дата обращения: 15.06.2017).
23. Osborne D., Gaebler T. Reinventing Government: How the Entrepreneurial Spirit is transforming the Public Sector. Boston: Addison-Wesley, 1992. 412 p.
24. Riley B.T. Electronic Governance and Electronic Democracy: Living and Working in the connected world. London, 2000. 130 р.
25. Seifert J., Bonham G. The Transformative Potential of E-Government in Transitional Democracies [Электронный ресурс]. URL: http://faculty.maxwell.syr.edu/gmbonham/Transformative_Potential_of_E-Government.pdf (дата обращения: 14.06.2017).
26. Sharma S., Gupta J. Building Blocks of an E-government-A Framework // Journal of Electronic Commerce in Organizations. 2003. Vol. 1. № 4. P. 34-49.
27. Writing in Nonacademic Settings (Perspective on Writing Research) / eds. O. Lee, D. Goswami. New York: Guilford, 1985. 553 p.
Review
Views:
259
Email this article 