The Heartland Phenomenon: Essence, Evolution
https://doi.org/10.18384/2224-0209-2026-1-1708
Abstract
Aim. To study the essence of the Heartland phenomenon, the evolution of its forms of existence, as well as its role in the confrontation between land power and sea power in the process of the world domination gaining.
Methodology. The main content of the study is an analysis of the Heartland phenomenon in its two forms: the original, as a geographical and social political connection between Germany and Russia, and the current, legally formalized union between Russia and China. Systemic, comparative, and phenomenological research methods are employed. Contemporary interstate treaties and strategic planning documents of modern countries are analyzed through the prism of the topic under consideration.
Results. The geopolitical value of the Heartland can be explained by the fact that control over it is a necessary step in the process of achieving global domination. The analysis revealed that the Heartland phenomenon has not faded into history, but it still proves itself relevant in modern conditions as its essence is immutable, and only its forms of existence change depending on specific historical conditions.
Research implications. A certain contribution to the theory of political systems is made by the study of the forms and patterns of confrontation between states during their struggle for world domination.
About the Author
Natalia A. Komleva
Academy of Geopolitical Problems
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Center of Geopolitical Analysis. Dr. Sci. (Political sciences), Prof.
References
1. Buchanan, P. (2003). The Death of the West. Moscow; St. Petersburg: AST publ., Terra fantastica publ. (in Russ.).
2. Gankhuyag, Erdenebayar (2017). Russia – Mongolia: Along the Path of Strategic Partnership. In: RUDN Journal of Russian History, 16 (3), 462–476 (in Russ.).
3. Gerasimov, D. I. (2022). Between the Kuomintang and the CPC: the Policy of the Soviet State in China (1918–1927). In: Historical Journal: Scientific Research, 5, 14–32 (in Russ.).
4. Zuenko, I. Yu. (2024). China in the Xi Jinping Era. Moscow: AST publ. (in Russ.).
5. Komleva, N. A. (2013). Limitrophe in the Modern Geopolitical Process. In: E-Almanac Space and Time, 3 (1). URL: http://e-almanac.space-time.ru/index/tom-3.-vyipusk-1 (accessed: 12.12.2025) (in Russ.).
6. Lomakin, A. S. (2023). Analysis of the Activities of the Federal Republic of Germany within NATO. In: Bulletin of Moscow University. Series 27: Global Studies and Geopolitics, 2, 19–38 (in Russ.).
7. Luzyanin, S. G. (2022). Russian Mongolian Relations and the Chinese Factor: Modern Transformations. In: East Asia: Facts and Analytics, 4, 6–15 (in Russ.).
8. Mackinder, H. D. (1995). The Geographical Axis of History. In: Polis. Political Studies, 4, 162–170 (in Russ.).
9. Mackinder, H. D. (2011). Democratic Ideals and Reality. In: Polis. Political Studies, 20 (2), 134–144 (in Russ.).
10. Romanova, G. N. (2018). The Role of the Soviet Union in the Industrialization of Northeast China (1950s – early 1960s): Experience and Assessment. In: Proceedings of the Institute of History, Archaeology and Ethnology FEB RAS, 18, 138–143 (in Russ.).
11. Khomushku, A. M. (2020). Political Culture and Foreign Policy of Modern Mongolia. In: Vestnik of Tuvan State University. Social Sciences and Humanities, 1, 63–72 (in Russ.).
12. Zou Xiuchun (2020). “Following Russia’s Path”: The Experience of Transforming Chinese Society. In: Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Sociology, 37 (3), 340–349 (in Russ.).
13. Chudodeev, Yu. V. (2025). The USSR and China on the Eve and During World War II. In: Society and State in China, 2 (45), 750–772 (in Russ.).
14. Spengler, O. (1993). Der Untergang des Abendlandes. Moscow: Mysl publ. (in Russ.).
15. Yan, Kuisun. (2021). The Influence of Soviet Russia on the Formation of the Communist Party of China. In: Historical Courier, 6, 105–110 (in Russ.).
16.
Review
Views:
171
JATS XML
Email this article 