EVOLUTION OF DISSERTATION ACTIVITY IN LINGUISTICS IN RUSSIA
https://doi.org/10.18384/2224-0209-2025-4-1637
Abstract
Aim. To study and analyze dissertation activity in linguistics in the USSR and Russia from the late of 20th century to the first quarter of 21st century. To identify main trends in linguistic research, priorities, and prospects.
Methodology. The main research methods include corpus-based, bibliometric, and quantitative analysis. These methods were applied to data from dissercat.com and a corpus of dissertation topics from several universities across the country, providing generalized analytical insights into the research potential of contemporary linguistic studies.
Results. The comparative analysis revealed trends in topic selection, highlighted the issue of declining theoretical significance of Cand. Sci. theses and outlined prospects for the development of theoretical and applied linguistics.
Research implications. The key findings of the analysis of recent research in linguistics are significant for understanding and addressing related challenges in the broader outline of the humanities.
About the Author
Olga I. MaksimenkoRussian Federation
Dr. Sci. (Philology), Prof., Department of Language Theory, Anglistics and Applied Linguistics
References
1. Vanchugov, V. V. (2011). The Russian “Master of Philosophy” in the Educational Process of the 19th – Early 20th Centuries. In: RUDN Journal of Philosophy, 1, 1–14 (in Russ.).
2. Krichevsky, G. G. (1958). Dissertations of Russian Universities. 1805–1919. Moscow: Moscow university publ. (in Russ.).
3. Maksimenko, O. I. (2024). Academic and Applied Philology: Current State and Challenges. In: 300th Anniversary of Russian Science: Proceedings of the International Scientific and Practical Conference, Moscow, April 24–25, 2024. Moscow: Moscow Power Engineering Institute, pp. 268–272 (in Russ.).
4. Maksimenko, O. I. (2024). Academic and Applied Philology: Analysis of Dissertation Activity. In: First Eurasian Congress of Linguists, Moscow, December 9–13, 2024. Moscow: Institute of Linguistics of the Russian Academy of Sciences publ., pp. 1119–1120 (in Russ.).
5. Malakhov, V. A. (2022). Bibliometric Analysis as a Method of Science Studies: Possibilities and Limitations. In: Science Studies, 1, 212–227 (in Russ.).
6. Sarsenbaeva, B., Zhigitbekova, N. & Bisembaeva, N. (2025). Psychological Aspects of Hyperstimulation and a Decreased Cognitive Flexibility in Children with Digital Addiction. In: Bulletin of KazNPU named after Abai. The Psychology Series, 8, 132–153 (in Russ.).
7. Stepanchuk, Yu. A. (2020). Humanitarian Knowledge between Digital and Meaning: On the Role of the Humanities in a Digital Society. In: Izvestia Ural Federal University Journal. Series 1. Issues in Education, Science and Culture, 26 (1), 112–119 (in Russ.).
8. Tsvetkov, V. A. & Dudin, M. N. (2020). Development Scenarios of the Global Economy and the Main Centers of Economic Gravity after the End of the COVID-19 Pandemic (OECD, BRICS, ASEAN, the League of Arab States). In: Market Economy Problems, 2, 6–22 (in Russ.).
9. Yakushev, A. N. & Kuznetsov, A. V. (2007). Russian Dissertation History in G. G. Krichevsky’s Research. In: Russian Journal of Library Science, 5, 80–84 (in Russ.).
10. Clark, W. (2008). Academic Charisma and the Origins of the Research University. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
11. Denifle, H. (2024). Die Entstehung der Universitäten des Mittelalters bis 1400 (German Edition). Мoscow: Nobel Press publ.
12. Rashdall, H. (1984). The Universities of Europe in the Middle Ages. Oxford: The Clarendon Press.






















