Preview

Russian Social and Humanitarian Journal

Advanced search

ON THE CONCEPTUAL BASIS OF TERRITORIAL BRANDING AS A STATE POLICY COMPONENT

https://doi.org/10.18384/2224-0209-2025-4-1615

Abstract

Aim. To identify advantages and limitations of the main approaches that territorial branding has in the context of public policy, and to form an approach relevant for application in Russia.

Methodology. Qualitative content analysis of territorial branding concepts in the context of both correlation with public policy and formation of cognitive perception of space is applied.

Results. The conducted analysis of territorial branding concepts makes it possible to identify three approaches that reveal it as a component of public policy: 1) the economic approach, whose proponents focus on the role of a place brand in attracting domestic and foreign investment and developing tourism; 2) identity-oriented participatory marketing, whose proponents link the issue with social, cultural, and political aspects and emphasize the importance of the participation of various actors in shaping a place brand; 3) the political-geographical approach, whose proponents interpret branding as the cognitive development of space by the state and draw attention to the role of a place brand in shaping Russia's response to current spatial challenges.

Research implications. The results of the article substantiate the potential of a political-geographical approach to territorial branding, highlights its conceptual foundations, defines and formulates the goal of state policy for the cognitive development of space, and explores the role of place branding as a mechanism for its implementation. It also updates the discussion of the theory and practice of place branding, noting the impact of the proposed approach on the search for new ways to strengthen the legitimacy of government, ensure territorial integrity, and ensure social cohesion.

About the Author

Vladislav V. Pernikov
Lomonosov Moscow State University
Russian Federation

Postgraduate student, Department of Public Policy, Faculty of Political Science



References

1. Zamyatin, D. N. (2020). Geocultural Branding of Cities and Territories: From Theory to Practice. Moscow: Aleteya publ. (in Russ.).

2. Kireeva, I. V., Kukva, E. S. & Shadzhe, A. Yu. (2024). Branding Regions to Strengthen Russian National Identity: Empirical Challenge and Expert Response. In: Bulletin of the Institute of Sociology, 15 (1), 91–113 (in Russ.).

3. Kolosov, V. A. (2008). Geographical Images and Geopolitical Representations: Paths of Formation and Approaches to Study. In: Bulletin of Far Eastern State Transport University. Series 1: Humanities, 1, 72–91 (in Russ.).

4. Okunev, I. Yu. (2023). Electoral Geography. Moscow: Aspect Press publ. (in Russ.).

5. Rzun, I. G. & Starkova, N. O. (2016). Formation of a Regional Brand Management Model. In: Bulletin of Nizhny Novgorod State Engineering and Economic University, 9, 54–64 (in Russ.).

6. Ustinovich, E. S. (2022). Branding of Russian Territories in the Implementation of the State’s Foreign Economic Activity. In: Hotel Business, 4, 45–52 (in Russ.).

7. Frolov, D. P., Strekalova, A. S. & Tazhibov, A. A. (2020). Heterodox Theories of Territorial Strategization. In: Russian Journal of Economic Theory, 17 (1), 65–78 (in Russ.).

8. Ashworth, G. A. & Voogd, H. (1990). Selling the City: Marketing Approaches in Public Sector Urban Planning. Belhaven Press.

9. Boisen, M., Terlouw, K. & van Gorp, B. (2018). The Selective Nature of Place Branding. In: Journal of Place Management and Development, 11 (1), 2–19.

10. Cleave, E., Arku, G., Sadler, R., et al. (2016). The Role of Place Branding in Local and Regional Economic Development: Bridging the Gap between Policy and Practicality. In: Regional Studies, Regional Science, 3 (1), 207–228.

11. Gonzalez, L. R. & Gale, F. (2020). Place Branding as Participatory Governance? An Interdisciplinary Case Study of Tasmania, Australia. In: SAGE Open, 10 (2), 1–15.

12. Govers, R. & Go, F. (2009). Place Branding: Glocal, Virtual and Physical Identities, Constructed, Imagined and Experienced. London: Palgrave.

13. Kavaratzis, M. (2004). Place Branding: An Interdisciplinary Approach. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

14. Kotler, P., Haider, D. H. & Rein, I. J. (1993). Marketing Places: Attracting Investment, Industry, and Tourism to Cities, States, and Nations. New York: Free Press.

15. Lucarelli, A. (2018). Place Branding as Urban Policy: The (Im)Political Place Branding. In: Cities, 80, 12–21.

16. Oliveira, E. (2016). Place Branding in Strategic Spatial Planning: An Analysis at the Regional Scale with Special References to Northern Portugal [dissertation]. Groningen.

17. Pogodina, V., Yakovleva, S., Matveevskaya, A. et al. (2021). Geo-Branding as a Tool for Realizing Russia’s Interests in the International Arena. In: Bolgov, R., Atnashev, V., Gladkiy, Y. et al. Proceedings of Topical Issues in International Political Geography. Cham: Springer, pp. 396–407.

18. Potapovs, M. (2024). Place Branding: Is It Public Policy, or isn’t It? In: Place Branding and Public Diplomacy, 24, 275–292.

19. Zenzile, M. (2024). Connecting Place Branding to Social and Governance Constructs in Johannesburg, South Africa. In: Place Branding and Public Diplomacy, 20, 408–423.


Supplementary files

Review

Views: 11


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2224-0209 (Online)