THE FUTURE IN THE PRESENT: ON FUTURE TIME REFERENCE IN RUSSIAN AND ENGLISH
https://doi.org/10.18384/2224-0209-2023-4-1340
Abstract
Aim. To focus on such a feature of future time reference as talking about the future through the forms of the present tense in the comparison of the Russian and English languages.
Methodology. The key research methods were hypothetical-deductive method, the analysis and synthesis of scientific materials on the research topic and the introspection method. The analysis of the linguistic discussion on the opposition of the present/past/future trichotomy and the past/non-past dichotomy is given. Special attention is paid to the question if the tendency to focus primarily on the present is equally represented in the two languages under consideration at the level of the verb forms usage.
Results. It is emphasized that from the linguistic-philosophical point of view the ability to express the present and the future by means of one form reflects the peculiarities of human perception of time. This feature can be recognized as universal for different languages and it manifests itself in Russian and English. An open-to-discussion hypothesis is put forward that the reference to the future through the present is more widely expressed in everyday speech in English than in Russian.
Research implications. The article updates the problems of comparative study of the features of future time reference in language and speech.
About the Author
Irina B. Ushakova
Khabarovsk State University of Economics and Law
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Сand. Sci. (Philology), Assoc. Prof., Department of Foreign Languages and Intercultural Communication
References
1. Apresyan Yu. D. [The image of a person according to language data: an attempt at a systemic description]. In: Voprosy yazykoznaniya [Questions of linguistics], 1995, no. 1, pp. 37–67.
2. Burdina I. V. Leksiko-semanticheskie sposoby vyrazheniya kategorii vremeni v ontogeneze rechi: dis. … kand. filol. Nauk [Lexico-semantic ways of expressing the category of time in the ontogenesis of speech: Cand. Sci. thesis in Philolology]. Moscow, 1997. 146 p.
3. Vinogradov V. V. Russkii yazyk. Grammaticheskoe uchenie o slove [Russian language. Grammatical doctrine of words]. Moscow, Russkii Yazyk Publ., 2001. 720 p.
4. Gak V. G. Yazyk kak forma samovyrazheniya Naroda [Language as a form of self-expression of the people]. Moscow, Nauka Publ., 2000, pp. 54–68.
5. Katagoshchina I. T. [Traditional space-time concepts and social development in Tropical Africa]. In: Prostranstvo i vremya v arkhaicheskikh i traditsionnykh kul'turakh [Space and time in archaic and traditional cultures]. Moscow, Institut Afriki RAN Publ., 1996, pp. 51–64.
6. Kravchenko A. V. Yazyk i vospriyatie: Kognitivnye aspekty yazykovoi kategorizatsii [Language and perception: Cognitive aspects of linguistic categorization]. Irkutsk, Izdatelstvo Irkutskogo universiteta Publ., 1996. 160 p.
7. Lakoff J., Johnson M. Metaphors We Live (Rus. ed.: Baranov A. N., Morozova A. V., transls. Metafory, kotorymi my zhivem. Moscow, URSS Publ., 2004. 256 p.).
8. Arutyunova A. D., ed. Logicheskii analiz yazyka. Lingvofuturizm. Vzglyad yazyka v budushchee [Logical analysis of language. Linguistic futurism. Language's look into the future]. Moscow, Indrik Publ., 2011. 519 p.
9. Palkin A. D. [Regarding the ambivalence of the future tense in Japanese]. In: Arutyunova A. D., ed. Logicheskii analiz yazyka. Lingvofuturizm. Vzglyad yazyka v budushchee [Logical analysis of language. Linguistic futurism. Language's look into the future]. Moscow, Indrik Publ., 2011, pp. 245–253.
10. Postovalova V. I. Yazyk i miroponimanie. Opyt lingvofilosofskoi interpretatsii [Language and worldview. Experience of linguo-philosophical interpretation]. Moscow, URSS Publ., 2016. 308 p.
11. Razorenov D. A. [Linguistic and cultural features of the concept “Time” in English]. In: Izvestiya Tul'skogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Gumanitarnye nauki [Bulletin of Tula State University. Film Humanities], 2010, no. 1, pp. 329–335.
12. Runova N. V. [Time in Russian and Anglo-American journalistic discourse through the prism of metonymy]. In: Zabotkina V. I., ed. Rossiya: izmenyayushchiisya obraz vremeni skvoz' prizmu yazyka. Reprezentatsiya kontsepta vremeni v russkom yazyke v sopostavlenii s angliiskim i nemetskim yazykami [Russia: the changing image of time through the prism of language. Representation of the concept of time in Russian in comparison with English and German languages]. Moscow, Rukopisniye pamyatniki Drevnei Rusi Publ., 2012, pp. 351–357.
13. Seleznyova O. N. Differentsiatsiya sredstv vyrazheniya budushchego vremeni v sovremennom angliiskom yazyke: dis. … kand. filol. nauk [Differentiation of means of expressing the future tense in modern English: Cand. Sci. thesis in Philolology]. Tver, 2015. 171 p.
14. Stoinova N. M. [Future tense]. In: Russkaya korpusnaya grammatika [Russian corpus grammar], 2018. Available at: http://rusgram.ru/Будущее_время (accessed: 07.05.2022).
15. Chuikova O. Yu. Semantika budushchego vremeni v russkom, angliiskom i ispanskom yazykakh: vzaimodeistvie temporal'nosti, aspektual'nosti i modal'nosti: avtoref. dis. ... kand. filol. nauk [Semantics of the future tense in Russian, English and Spanish: interaction of temporality, aspectuality and modality: abstract of Cand. Sci. thesis in Philology]. St. Petersburg, 2018. 26 p.
16. Aarts B. Oxford Modern English Grammar. Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2011. 652 p.
17. Clark H., Clark E. Psychology and language. New York, Chicago, Harcourt Brace Jovanovich Inc., 1977. 608 p.
18. Comrie B. Tense. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1993. 139 p.
19. Denis D., Tagliamonte S. The changing future: Competition, specialization and reorganization in the contemporary English future temporal reference system. In: English Language and Linguistics, 2018, no. 22, pp. 403–430.
20. Depraetere I., Christopher W. Special issue on future time reference in English. In: English Language and Linguistics, 2010, no. 14, pp. 161–162.
21. Kissine M., de Brabanter Ph., Sharifzadeh S. Future Times, Future Tenses. Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2014. 297 p.
22. McCarthy D. Language development in children. In: Manual of child psychology. New York, John Wiley & Sons Inc., 1946, pp. 476–581.
23. Quirk R. A Grammar of Contemporary English. Harlow, Longman, 1985. 922 p.
24. Radovanović A. A. A Contribution to the Future Tense Debate – A Case Study from Serbian. In: Српски језик: студије српске и словенске, 2019, no. 24, pp. 675–691.
25. Salkie R. Will: Tense or modal or both? In: English Language and Linguistics, 2010, no. 14, pp. 187–215.
26. Tyler A., Jan H. Be going to and will: Talking about the future using embodied experience. In: Language and Cognition, 2017, no. 9, pp. 412–445.
Supplementary files
Review
Views:
188
Email this article 