Preview

Russian Social and Humanitarian Journal

Advanced search

HYBRID WARS PLATFORM AS AN INSTRUMENT FOR GEO-ECONOMIC TRANSFORMATION OF THE WORLD

https://doi.org/10.18384/2224-0209-2021-3-1079

Abstract

Aim. To define the place of the platform of the hybrid wars and the related instruments in the on-going global transformations that lead to the deep reshuffle of the international economic relations including the basic interrelationships of the economic interdependence that were formed in the era of mature globalization. Methodology. Clusterization of the focus points of the transformations on the regional level in order to locate and define key instruments used to manage (stimulate and guide) the transformations. The transformations are analyzed through the prism of Thomas Shelling’s “theory of conflict” and its subsequent interpretations but with consideration of the new role of the information society. Results. The conclusions were made about the increasing importance of the military and in general - force components in the spectrum of the “hybrid war” instruments since the current generation of informational manipulation means appeared to be insufficient to reach the geo-economic objectives that major global centers of power face. At the same time the platform of “hybrid wars” remains operationally the most secure one to manage safely the chains of conflicts aimed to geo-economically transform regions and macro-regions. Research implications. The conclusion was made on the inevitability of the development of a new generation of the “hybrid wars” that would be based upon wider variety of instruments in the “transition zone” between the peacetime competition and “hot” conflict with military components.

About the Author

D. G. Evstafiev
National Research University Higher School of Economics
Russian Federation


References

1. Бартош А. А. «Серые зоны» как ключевой элемент современного операционного пространства гибридной войны» // Военная мысль. 2021. № 2. C. 6-19.

2. Гэддис Дж. Л. О большой стратегии / пер. с англ. О. Филиппова, А. Шаломицкой. М.: Издательство Института Гайдара, 2021. 424 с.

3. Евстафьев Д. Г. Евразия в эпоху силовой геоэкономики: особенности трансформаций и возможности нейтрализации рисков // Электронный научный журнал «Евразия.Эксперт». 2021. № 1. URL: https://journal.eurasia.expert/s271332140014382-7-1/?fbclid=IwAR2ZZLf7lEmMxkpymUf6wT8mKfOQdB9W0_tB_lfIw4KXPeaLT8AUA-n84CM. DOI 10.18254/S271332140014382-7 (дата обращения: 15.03.2021).

4. Калдор М. Новые и старые войны: организованное насилие в глобальную эпоху / пер. с англ. А. Апполлонова, М. Дондуковского. М.: Издательство Института Гайдара, 2016. 416 с.

5. Конфликты низкой интенсивности в американской военно-политической стратегии в начале XXI века / под ред. В. И. Батюка; Институт США и Канады РАН. М.: Издательство «Весь мир», 2018. 192 с.

6. Кременюк В. А. Международные конфликты: проблемы управления и контроля. М.: ИСКРАН, 2006. 222 с.

7. Максименко И. А., Богданов А. С. Современные подходы к информационно-аналитической деятельности по выявлению гибридных угроз // Военная мысль. 2021. № 5. С. 42-49.

8. Можегов В. И. Мировая гражданская война. М.: Родина, 2021. 224 с.

9. Шеллинг Т. Стратегия конфликта; пер. с англ. под редакцией Ю. Кузнецова; издание 2-е, испр. М.: ИРИСЭН, Социум, 2014. 367 с.

10. Farrell H., Newman A. Weaponized Interdependence: How Global Economic Networks Shape State Coercion // International Security. 2019. Vol. 44. Iss. 1. P. 42-79. DOI: 10.1162/isec_a_00351.

11. Haass R., Kupchan С. The New Concert of Powers How to Prevent Catastrophe and Promote Stability in a Multipolar World [Электронный ресурс] // Foreign Affairs : [сайт]. URL: https://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/world/2021-03-23/new-concert-powers?utm_medium=newsletters&utm_source=fatoday&utm_campaign=What%20the%20WHO%20Investigation%20Reveals%20About%20the%20Origins%20of%20COVID-19&utm_content=20210331&utm_term=FA%20Today%20-%20112017 (дата обращения: 15.03.2021).

12. Mazarr M. Rethinking Restraint: Why It Fails in Practice // The Washington Quarterly. 2020. Vol. 43. Iss. 2. P. 7-32. DOI: 10.1080/0163660X.2020. 1771042.

13. Moghadam A., Wyss M., The Political Power of Proxies: Why Nonstate Actors Use Local Surrogates // International Security. 2020. Vol. 44. Iss. 4. P. 119-157. DOI: 10.1162/isec_a_00377.

14. Nye J. S. Jr. How Sharp Power Threatens Soft Power. The Right and Wrong Ways to Respond to Authoritarian Influence [Электронный ресурс] // Foreign Affairs : [сайт]. URL: https://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/china/2018-01-24/how-sharp-power-threatens-soft-power (дата обращения: 15.03.2021).

15. Operationalizing Cyberspace as a Domain: Lessons for NATO / Ablon L., Binnendijk A., Hodgson Q. E., Lilly B., Romanosky S., Senty D., Thompson J. A. [Электронный ресурс] // RAND Corporation : [сайт]. URL: https://www.rand.org/pubs/perspectives/PE329.html (дата обращения: 15.03.2021). DOI: 10.7249/PE329.

16. The Secretary General’s Annual Report 2020, 16-Mar.-2021 [Электронный ресурс] // NATO : [сайт]. URL: https://www.nato.int/cps/en/natohq/opinions_182236.htm?selectedLocale=en (дата обращения: 15.03.2021).

17. Wigell M. Democratic Deterrence: How to Dissuade Hybrid Interference // The Washington Quarterly. 2021. Vol. 44. Iss. 1. P. 49-67. DOI: 10.1080/0163660X.2021.1893027.


Review

Views: 432


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2224-0209 (Online)