INTERPRETING ALGORITHM FOR A TEXT COGNITIVE SCRIPT ARCHITECTONICS IN NON-FICTION
https://doi.org/10.18384/2224-0209-2022-3-1106
Abstract
Aim. To create an interpretive taxonomic model of a text cognitive script, represented in the conceptual domain of documentary prose.
Methodology. By means of the innovative author’s interpreting algorithm for text cognitive script architectonics represented in the conceptual domain of documentary prose, the specific features of a complex taxonomic model as a dynamic textual research construct are identified.
Results. For the first time, a complex taxonomic model of a text cognitive script, represented in the conceptual domain of documentary prose, has been interpreted; the author’s interpreting algorithm for text cognitive script architectonics as a dynamic construct of the conceptual domain of documentary prose is proposed; a typology of research constructs which compose the conceptual domain of documentary prose is proposed; the correlation between the text cognitive script architectonics and the functioning of text cognitive attractors in the conceptual domain of documentary prose is substantiated.
Research implications. The results of this scientific research contribute to the further development of cognitive poetics, the methodology of interpretative taxonomic modeling of textual cognitive constructs. The terms “documentary and literary concept” and “spatial-temporal cyclicity” are introduced into the scientific thesaurus. The author’s typology of documentary and literary concept is presented. The results of the study can be applied in lectures on text theory and cognitive poetics.
About the Author
Elena A. Ogneva
Belgorod National Research University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Dr. Sci. (Philology), Prof., Departmental Head, Department of Foreign Languages
References
1. Alefirenko N. F., Shakhputova Z. Kh. [Autochthonous Synergy of Literary Text Discourse]. In: Shaklein V. M., ed. Russkii yazyk v sovremennom nauchnom i obrazovatel'nom prostranstve: sbornik tezisov mezhdunarodnoi nauchnoi konferentsii, Moskva, 28–29 oktyabrya 2020 g. [Russian language in modern scientific and educational space: collection of abstracts of the International scientific conference, Moscow, 28–29 October, 2020]. Moscow, Peoples' Friendship University of Russia Publ., 2020, pp. 3–6.
2. Bogachev R. E. [The language structure factor in the analysis of the language picture of the world]. In: Nauchnaya mysl' Kavkaza [Scientific thought of Caucasus], 2008, no. 3 (55), pp. 70–74.
3. Boldyrev N. N. [Conceptual basis of the language]. In: Kubryakova E. S., Boldyrev N. N., eds. Kognitivnye issledovaniya yazyka. Vyp. ІV. Kontseptualizatsiya mira v yazyke [Cognitive studies of language. Iss. IV. Conceptualization of the world in language]. Moscow, IYA RAN Publ., Tambov, TGU im. G. R. Derzhavina Publ., 2009, pp. 25–78.
4. Buzina E. I. [Expression specificity of the dynamics of textual space in the novel "Rebecca" by Daphne Du Maurier]. In: Sedykh A. P., ed. Leksikologiya i kommunikatsiya – 2018: sbornik materialov IV Mezhdunarodnoi nauchnoi konferentsii, Belgorod, 26–27 aprelya 2018 g. [Lexicology and Communication – 2018: Proceedings of the IV International Scientific Conference, Belgorod, 26–27 April, 2018]. Belgorod, BelGU Publ., 2018, pp. 86–89.
5. Gallo J., Alefirenko N. F. [Text Linguistics: Traditions and Perspectives]. In: Filologicheskii klass [Philological class], 2020, vol. 25, no. 3, pp. 23–38.
6. Glamazda S. N. [Contextual polarization as a format of knowledge]. In: Teoriya yazyka i mezhkul'turnaya kommunikatsiya [Theory of Language and Intercultural Communication], 2020, no. 2 (37). Available at: tl-ic.kursksu.ru (accessed: 12.05.2022).
7. Golovanova E. I., Kovaleva O. N. [Cognitive Mechanisms of Compression of Evaluative Meaning in a Literary Text]. In: Voprosy kognitivnoi lingvistiki [The journal Issues of Cognitive Linguistics], 2017, no. 3 (52), pp. 31–36.
8. Danilenko I. A. [The category of a text completeness within F.S. Fitzgerald’s works]. In: Filologicheskii aspekt [Philological aspect], 2016, no. 12, pp. 57–61.
9. Dekhnich O. V. [Cognitive modelling and metaphor theory in linguistics of today]. In: Kognitivnye issledovaniya yazyka [Cognitive Studies of Language], 2014, no. 18, pp. 65–68.
10. Epifantseva N. G. [Realias and their place in the language picture of the world]. In: Skuratov I. V., ed. Evolyutsiya romanskikh yazykov: ot yazyka narodnosti k yazyku natsii: materialy mezhdunarodnoi nauchnoi konferentsii, Moskva, 26–27 iyunya 2018 g. [The evolution of Romance languages: from the language of the people to the language of the nation: materials of the international scientific conference, Moscow, 26–27 June, 2018]. Moscow, MRSU Ed. off. Publ., 2018, pp. 188–193.
11. Zhirova I. G. [The structure of utterance and the system of language communication tools: based on contemporary literary works of art]. In: Nauchnyi rezul'tat. Voprosy teoreticheskoi i prikladnoi lingvistiki [Research Result. Theoretical and Applied Linguistics], 2020, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 85–98.
12. Interpretatsiya teksta i ego grammaticheskikh modelei (tipologicheskii aspekt) [Interpretation of the text and its grammatical models (typological aspect)] / Levchenko M. N., Eliseeva A. A., Elistratova I. V., Zakharova M. Yu., Kazarina M. A., Tarasova O. I. Moscow, MRSU Ed. off. Publ., 2013. 240 p.
13. Iriskhanova O. K. [On the question of changing the dynamics of the narrative]. In: Tarasova M. A., ed. Obrazy yazyka i zigzagi diskursa: sbornik nauchnykh statei k 70-letiyu V. Z. Dem'yankova [Images of language and zigzags of discourse: a collection of scientific articles dedicated to the 70th anniversary of V. Z. Demyankov]. Moscow, Kul'turnaya revolyutsiya Publ., 2018, pp. 192–215.
14. Karasik V. I. [Semiotic vectors of concept modelling]. In: Tuova R.Kh., ed. Lingvistika budushchego: novye tendentsii i perspektivy: materialy mezhdunarodnoi nauchnoi konferentsii, Maikop, 01–02 noyabrya 2019 g. [Linguistics of the Future: New Trends and Prospects: Proceedings of the International Scientific Conference, Maykop, 01–02 November 2019]. Maykop, Adygeiskii gosudarstvennyi universitet Publ., 2019, pp. 15–22.
15. Kiose M. I. ["Successful Interpretation" of Text Imagery in Modern Cognitive Concepts]. In: Tarasova M. A., ed. Obrazy yazyka i zigzagi diskursa: sbornik nauchnykh statei k 70-letiyu V. Z. Dem'yankova [Images of language and zigzags of discourse: a collection of scientific articles dedicated to the 70th anniversary of V. Z. Demyankov]. Moscow, Kul'turnaya revolyutsiya Publ., 2018, pp. 290–315.
16. Kiose M. I. Sekrety interpretatsii teksta i izobrazheniya. Konstruirovanie i okulograficheskii eksperiment [Secrets of text and image interpretation. Construction and oculographic experiment]. Moscow, R. Valent Publ., 2021. 236 p.
17. Kushneruk S. L. Kognitivno-diskursivnoe miromodelirovanie: opyt sopostavitel'nogo issledovaniya reklamnoi kommunikatsii [Cognitive-discursive world modeling: experience of a comparative study of advertising communication]. Moscow, Flinta Publ., 2019. 368 p.
18. Levchenko M. N. [The category of information in a philosophical text]. In: Vestnik Moskovskogo gosudarstvennogo oblastnogo universiteta. Seriya: Lingvistika [Bulletin of the Moscow State Regional University. Series: Linguistics], 2022, no. 1, pp. 14–23.
19. Maksimenko O. I., Podryadova V. V. [Attractiveness in the theory of language]. In: Uchenye zapiski natsional'nogo obshchestva prikladnoi lingvistiki [Scholars of the National Society for Applied Linguistics], 2013, no. 1 (1), pp. 66–73.
20. Ogneva E. A. [The concept of interpreting the textual cognitive script architectonics]. In: Nauchnyi rezul'tat [Research Result], 2014, vol. 1, no. 2 (2), pp. 75–87.
21. Ogneva E. A. [Architectonics of textual cognitive script at the interpretive sphere of translation]. In: Voprosy kognitivnoi lingvistiki [Issues of Cognitive Linguistics], 2015, no. 2, pp. 61–70.
22. Ogneva E. A. [Conception of text cognitive attraction]. In: Ogneva E. A., Akinshina I. B., eds. Lingvisticheskie gorizonty: mezhdunarodnyi sbornik nauchnykh trudov. Vyp. VI [Linguistic horizons: an international collection of scientific papers. Iss. VI]. Belgorod, Epitsentr Publ., 2018, pp. 87–92.
23. Sidorova N. A., Kharchenko V. A. [The complete semantics of the text]. In: Uchenye zapiski natsional'nogo obshchestva prikladnoi lingvistiki [Scholars of the National Society for Applied Linguistics], 2018, no. 1 (21), pp. 82–99.
24. Trofimova N. A. [Frequency of non-verbal communication markers in women's publicistic discourse (based on the articles of Ellen Barry in “The New York Times”)]. In: Vestnik Voronezhskogo universiteta. Seriya: Lingvistika i mezhkul'turnaya kommunikatsiya [Proceedings of Voronezh State University. Series: Linguistics and intercultural communication], 2021, no. 2, pp. 83–90.
25. Kharchenko V. K. Maloizvestnye priemy i metodiki issledovaniya yazykovogo materiala [Little-known techniques and methods for studying language material]. Moscow, Izdatel'stvo Literaturnogo instituta im. A. M. Gor'kogo Publ., 2008. 128 p.
26. Boldyrev N. N. The Interpretive Dominant in The Cognitive Theory of Language. In: Pavlova A., ed. Philological Readings: European Proceedings of Social and Behavioral Sciences. Vol. 83. Grozny, 2020, pp. 1–8.
27. Fiction Cognitive Coordinates. E. A. Ogneva, A. A. Kutsenko, Ya. I. Kireeva, I. G. Besedina, I. A. Danilenko. In: Journal of Language and Literature, 2014, no. 5 (4), pp. 51–54.
28. Khvesko T. V. Place names metaphor in language and communication. In: Language and culture, 2018, no. 12, pp. 14–24.
29. Literary text as knowledge format. J. Baghana, E. I. Buzina, S. N. Glamazda, T. V. Khvesko, O. P. Lazareva. In: Journal of research in Applied Linguistics, 2019, vol. 10, no. 5, pp. 1186–1196.
30. Text and discoursе between Scylla and charibdis of cognitive linguopoetics. N. F. Alefirenko, I. I. Chumak-Zhun, E. G. Ozerova, K. K. Stebunova. In: Journal of Language and Literature, 2015, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 157–160.
31. The title of a literary text as a discursive phenomenon / S. A. Kosharnaya, I. I. Chumak-Zhun, L. I. Plotnikova, G. Y. Maltseva, S. M. Boldyreva. In: Journal of Research in Applied Linguistics, 2019, vol. 10, no. 5, pp. 396–404.
Review
Views:
328
Email this article 