evestnikРоссийский социально-гуманитарный журналRussian Social and Humanitarian Journal2224-0209State University of Education10.18384/2224-0209-2015-2-994evestnik-994Research ArticleПОЛИТОЛОГИЯ (Специальности 5.5.1, 5.5.2 и 5.5.3)POLITICSСПЕЦИФИКА ПРЕПОДАВАНИЯ ТЕОРЕТИЧЕСКОГО ЗНАНИЯ О ПОЛИТИКЕ В АМЕРИКАНСКОЙ ПОЛИТОЛОГИИSPECIFICITY OF TEACHING POLITICAL THEORY IN AMERICAN POLITICAL SCIENCEМайоровР. Н.MayorovR. ..noemail@neicon.ru2015300620150288Copyright © Майоров Р.Н., 20152015Майоров Р.Н.Mayorov R...Данная работа распространяется под лицензией Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.https://www.evestnik-mgou.ru/jour/article/view/994

В статье рассматривается процесс изменения статуса теоретического знания о политике в системе высшего образования в США с XVII в. до наших дней. Анализируется становление политологии как самостоятельной образовательной дисциплины, значение преподавания политических предметов в высшем образовании США в целом. На основе анализа содержания учебных курсов высших учебных заведений представлены выводы об отличительных чертах различных этапов развития политической теории в политологии как образовательной дисциплине. Представлены выводы о специфике преподавания политической теории в США.

The article analyzes the process of changing the status of theoretical knowledge of politics in the system of higher education in the United States since the XVIIth century up till now. The author studies the process of political science development as an academic discipline; and the importance of teaching political subjects in the USA universities. On the basis of the US higher education institutions curricula the author makes conclusions about the specificities of different stages of political theory and political science development. Besides, there are conclusions about the characteristic features of teaching political science in the USA.

политологияполитическая теорияпреподавание политологииполитическая наукаамериканская политологияpolitical sciencepolitical theoryteaching political scienceAmerican political scienceReferencesHaddow A. Political science in American colleges and universities 1636-1900. N.Y.: Octagon Books, 1969.Haddow A. Political science in American colleges and universities 1636-1900. N.Y.: Octagon Books, 1969.Kasza G.J. Unearthing the Roots of Hard Science // Making political science matter: debating knowledge, research, and method / Edited by Sanford F. Schram and Brian Caterino, New York University Press, 2006.Kasza G.J. Unearthing the Roots of Hard Science // Making political science matter: debating knowledge, research, and method / Edited by Sanford F. Schram and Brian Caterino, New York University Press, 2006.Kinnvall C. Not Here, Not now! The absence of a European Perestroika Movement // Perestroika! The raucous rebellion in political science / Edited by Kristen Renwick Monroe, Yale University Press, 2005.Kinnvall C. Not Here, Not now! The absence of a European Perestroika Movement // Perestroika! The raucous rebellion in political science / Edited by Kristen Renwick Monroe, Yale University Press, 2005.Pion-Berlin D. Clearly, Methodological Bias in APSR // Perestroika! The raucous rebellion in political science / Edited by Kristen Renwick Monroe, Yale University Press, 2005.Pion-Berlin D. Clearly, Methodological Bias in APSR // Perestroika! The raucous rebellion in political science / Edited by Kristen Renwick Monroe, Yale University Press, 2005.Progress Report of the Committee on Political Research // The American Political Science Review 1923. Vol. 17. № 2 (May).Progress Report of the Committee on Political Research // The American Political Science Review 1923. Vol. 17. № 2 (May).Report on Instruction in Political Science in Colleges and Universities // The American Political Science Review. 1914. Vol. 8. № 1 (Feb).Report on Instruction in Political Science in Colleges and Universities // The American Political Science Review. 1914. Vol. 8. № 1 (Feb).Report of the Committee on Policy of the American Political Science Association // The American Political Science Review. 1930.Vol. 24.№ 1 (Feb).Report of the Committee on Policy of the American Political Science Association // The American Political Science Review. 1930.Vol. 24.№ 1 (Feb).Ross D. The origins of American Social Science, Cambridge, 1991.Ross D. The origins of American Social Science, Cambridge, 1991.Schwartz-Shea P Is This the Curriculm We Want? Doctoral Requirements and Offerings in Methods and Methodology // PS: Political Science and Politics. 2003. Vol. 36. № 3 (July).Schwartz-Shea P Is This the Curriculm We Want? Doctoral Requirements and Offerings in Methods and Methodology // PS: Political Science and Politics. 2003. Vol. 36. № 3 (July).Goals for Political Science: Report of the Committee for the Advancement of Teaching / American Political Science Association. N.Y.: Sloane, 1951.Goals for Political Science: Report of the Committee for the Advancement of Teaching / American Political Science Association. N.Y.: Sloane, 1951.Warren D.T. Will the real perestroikniks please stand up? // Perestroika! The raucous rebellion in political science / Edited by Kristen Renwick Monroe. New Haven: Yale University Press, 2005.Warren D.T. Will the real perestroikniks please stand up? // Perestroika! The raucous rebellion in political science / Edited by Kristen Renwick Monroe. New Haven: Yale University Press, 2005.Report to the Council APSA Task Force on Graduate Education // Perestroika! The raucous rebellion in political science / Edited by Kristen Renwick Monroe. New Haven: Yale University Press, 2005.Report to the Council APSA Task Force on Graduate Education // Perestroika! The raucous rebellion in political science / Edited by Kristen Renwick Monroe. New Haven: Yale University Press, 2005.

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.